masterThesis
O eterno retorno como paródia e como colagem na filosofia da diferença de Gilles Deleuze
Fecha
2015-12-07Registro en:
ARAÚJO, André Vinícius Nascimento. O eterno retorno como paródia e como colagem na filosofia da diferença de Gilles Deleuze. 2015. 101f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Filosofia) - Centro de Ciências Humanas, Letras e Artes, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, 2015.
Autor
Araújo, André Vinícius Nascimento
Resumen
Gilles Deleuze hás commented on many philosophers, but his relationship with
Nietzsche plays a singular role in his thought: appropriating the concept of the “eternal
return” to think the central axis of his thesis, Difference and repetition (1968). Terms
“difference” and “repetition” appeared associated to eternal return in his Nietzsche and
philosophy (1962). Our dissertation thesis analyzes the presentations of that concept in
bothworks. Chapter one presents the style construction and critical, methodological
aspects of Nietzschean philosophy, fundamental elements to understand Deleuze’s
interpretation. It subsequently analyzes the first presentation of that concept, expressed
in the following terms: the aesthetic existence, either innocent or justified from the
figure of game. We will see how the image of game implies another concept of chance,
that leads Deleuze to think of an affirmative philosophical “type”, capable of creating
new values. Chapter two evaluates the existential, “ethical-selective”, “physicalcosmological”
character of the concept of eternal return, as much as the difficulties it
imposes upon Nietzsche’s interpreter. We present afterwards Deleuzian comprehension
of eternal return as a “parody” or a “simulacrum of doctrine”. Chapter three analyzes
that interpretive position as a transvaluation of values from a rearrange of perspectives
in order to overcome the negative comprehensions of existence. We want to question
the way Deleuze builds another image of thought from the concept of eternal return – an
image that, by a sort of “colagem” and selective elimination of the negativity, proposes
a historiographic work and unfolds a lineage of thinkers of immanence and difference, a
detour from the thought of identity, the same and the similar. We want thus to
understand Deleuze’s critique of “dogmatic image of thought”.