masterThesis
Elementos norteadores da relação orientador-orientando: evidências no mestrado acadêmico em ciências contábeis da UFRN
Fecha
2019-07-31Registro en:
BARBOSA, Ilana Inácio da Silva. Elementos norteadores da relação orientador-orientando: evidências no mestrado acadêmico em ciências contábeis da UFRN. 2019. 110f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Contábeis) - Centro de Ciências Sociais Aplicadas, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, 2019.
Autor
Barbosa, Ilana Inácio da Silva
Resumen
This study aims to investigate in the view of orientandos and orientadores the guiding elements
of this relation in the dissertation process of the MSc in Accounting Sciences of the Federal
University of Rio Grande do Norte. For this, interviews were conducted with 14 orientandos
and 8 program leaders. The analyzes of the interviews were carried out through content analysis,
with the assistance of ATLAS.ti®. The research approach was qualitative. The results on
guideline practice demonstrate convergence in the dyad accounts when reporting unsystematic
encounters during the writing of the dissertation. Regarding the competences, the interviewees
mentioned those of a technical and behavioral nature. Regarding the behavioral difficulties, the
majority of the orientandos and orientadores showed the inexistence of difficulties of this kind.
Regarding the behavioral factors that facilitated the orientation, the subjects were informed by
their involvement with the theme, their availability, the autonomy of choosing the theme, the
supervisor's empathy, zeal, confidence, motivation, patience, independence in work and respect
and punctuality as aspects that contributed to the relationship. The advisors cited humility,
autonomy, resilience, responsiveness, synergy and determination. Concerning convergences,
thematic and methodological issues were reported in pairs. On the divergences, the majority of
the orientandos reported those of theoretical and methodological character. For the minority of
the advisors, they pointed out the lack of discipline of the orientandos. Regarding the choice of
theme, a small asicronia in the speech of the dyad was noticed. About the accounts of the ease
with the writing, a tuning was perceived. In relation to the ease with the literature, there were
similarities in the binomial speeches, indicating a lack of initial knowledge of the literature
during the elaboration of the dissertation. On facilities with the methodology, the pairs reported
that they immediately had no domain. Regarding the operational difficulties, some orientandos
and orientadores revealed the methodological and thematic ones. On the operational factors
facilitating orientation, the methodological, thematic and literary affinity was identified in the
dyad's view. With regard to the misunderstanding between the pairs, orientandos and guiding
ones revealed the nonexistence of these. On particular problems, there were similarities in the
speech of the dyad about some reports of health problems, the profession and the family context.
As a suggestion for improvement in orientation the orientandos recommended an alignment of
the subject with the supervisor, timely feedback, a rearrangement in orientation, being
accessible, understanding the side of the orienting, transparency in the relation of the dyad, the
opening of the advisor to new subjects and the good sense of both sides. The advisors suggested
an agenda of meetings with the students, the recognition of the orienting profile and the respect of their particularities, a better follow-up of the student from the beginning of the course, the
synergy between the peers and the aspects of the research and the stimulation to the critical
spirit of the student.