dc.contributorSouza, Lincoln Moraes de
dc.contributor
dc.contributorhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/6915450911286133
dc.contributor
dc.contributorhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/5842101500628299
dc.contributorMoura, Dante Henrique
dc.contributor
dc.contributorhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/1720357515433453
dc.contributorVitullo, Gabriel Eduardo
dc.contributor
dc.contributorhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0274943582470997
dc.creatorBezerra, Emanuelly Medeiros
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-01T21:02:13Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T23:09:57Z
dc.date.available2016-08-01T21:02:13Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T23:09:57Z
dc.date.created2016-08-01T21:02:13Z
dc.date.issued2015-09-11
dc.identifierBEZERRA, Emanuelly Medeiros. A educação profissional em debate: uma avaliação política da formação para o trabalho ofertada pelo SENAC/RN através do Programa Nacional de Acesso ao Ensino Técnico e Emprego. 2015. 120f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Sociais) - Centro de Ciências Humanas, Letras e Artes, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, 2015.
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.ufrn.br/jspui/handle/123456789/21067
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3948389
dc.description.abstractIn this study, we present a political evaluation of how SENAC/RN perceives PRONATEC, emphasizing all ideological principles, aims and theories that this institution reproduces and reinforces while playing this professional qualification program. We intended to reveal ideological aspects that inspire SENAC’s perception of PRONATEC, pointing the actual interests hidden by those aspects. Our starting question is: What ideologies, objectives and theories that are explicitly or implicitly reinforced by Senac in implementing PRONATEC? In the research, we consider the hypothesis that transferring the responsibility about PRONATEC from public to private institutions is something that impoverishes the professional formation process, once the program ends up subordinated to private institution’s ideological, political and economic interests. The methodological approach chosen was the single case study. As data source, we used broad literature survey, official files of PRONATEC and SENAC, official information about the program and personal interviews. At the end of the research, we present elements that show some “flexibility” on PRONATEC due to SENAC’s interests, offering a superficial professional formation, commonly dissociated from a propaedeutic education, focusing on the need of adaptation e consensus of works around a society project. In this regard, despite PRONATEC is payed by public resources, it’s been used by SENAC as a fortifier of this institution on professional education market, in an hegemonic and neoliberal construction of a model of society.
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
dc.publisherBrasil
dc.publisherUFRN
dc.publisherPROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM CIÊNCIAS SOCIAIS
dc.rightsAcesso Aberto
dc.subjectAvaliação política
dc.subjectPronatec
dc.subjectSenac
dc.subjectHegemonia
dc.titleA educação profissional em debate: uma avaliação política da formação para o trabalho ofertada pelo SENAC/RN através do Programa Nacional de Acesso ao Ensino Técnico e Emprego
dc.typemasterThesis


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución