dc.contributor
dc.contributorhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7938151012228371
dc.contributor
dc.contributorhttp://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=K4784214T6
dc.contributorFrascaroli, Bruno Ferreira
dc.contributor
dc.contributorhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/5108964340357155
dc.contributorSampaio, Raquel Menezes Bezerra
dc.contributor
dc.contributorhttp://lattes.cnpq.br/9368661158330209
dc.creatorCavalcanti, Daniella Medeiros
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-02
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-17T14:34:44Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T23:05:21Z
dc.date.available2013-07-02
dc.date.available2014-12-17T14:34:44Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T23:05:21Z
dc.date.created2013-07-02
dc.date.created2014-12-17T14:34:44Z
dc.date.issued2013-02-28
dc.identifierCAVALCANTI, Daniella Medeiros. Avaliação dos impactos do programa bolsa família na renda, na educação e no mercado de trabalho das famílias pobres do Brasil. 2013. 74 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Economia Regional) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, 2013.
dc.identifierhttps://repositorio.ufrn.br/jspui/handle/123456789/14085
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3946474
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to verify the impact of the Bolsa Família Program (BFP) in income and school attendance of poor Brazilian families. It is intended to also check the existence of a possible negative effect of the program on the labor market, titled as sloth effect. For such, microdata from the IBGE Census sample in 2010 were used. Seeking to purge possible selection biases, methodology of Quantilic Treatment Effect (QTE) was applied, in particular the estimator proposed by Firpo (2007), which assumes an exogenous and non-conditional treatment. Moreover, Foster- Greer-Thorbecke (FGT) index was calculated to check if there are fewer households below the poverty line, as well as if the inequality among the poor decreases. Human Opportunity Index (HOI) was also calculated to measure the access of young people / children education. Results showed that BFP has positively influenced the family per capita income and education (number of children aged 5-17 years old attending school). As for the labor market (worked hours and labor income), the program showed a negative effect. Thus, when compared with not benefiting families, those families who receive the BFP have: a) a higher family income (due to the shock of the transfer budget money) b) more children attending school (due to the conditionality imposed by the program); c) less worked hours (due to sloth effect in certain family groups) and d) a lower income from work. All these effects were potentiated separating the sample in the five Brazilian regions, being observed that the BFP strongly influenced the Northeast, showing a greater decrease in income inequality and poverty, and at the same time, achieved a greater negative impact on the labor market
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
dc.publisherBR
dc.publisherUFRN
dc.publisherPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Economia
dc.publisherEconomia Regional
dc.rightsAcesso Aberto
dc.subjectAvaliação de Impacto Distributivo de Políticas Públicas. Programa Bolsa Família. Brasil
dc.subjectEvaluation Distributional Impact of Public Policies. Bolsa Família Program. Brazil
dc.titleAvaliação dos impactos do programa bolsa família na renda, na educação e no mercado de trabalho das famílias pobres do Brasil
dc.typemasterThesis


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución