dc.contributorUniversity of Alberta
dc.contributorUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
dc.contributorUniversidade Paulista (UNIP)
dc.contributorUniversity of Groningen
dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:30:45Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T19:00:19Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:30:45Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T19:00:19Z
dc.date.created2014-05-27T11:30:45Z
dc.date.issued2013-10-01
dc.identifierJournal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials, v. 101, n. 7, p. 1321-1328, 2013.
dc.identifier1552-4973
dc.identifier1552-4981
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/76678
dc.identifier10.1002/jbm.b.32945
dc.identifierWOS:000324302100024
dc.identifier2-s2.0-84884208055
dc.identifier9234456003563666
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3925557
dc.description.abstractMicroorganisms from the oral cavity may settle at the implant-abutment interface (IAI). As a result, tissue inflammation could occur around these structures. The databases MEDLINE/PubMed and PubMed Central were used to identify articles published from 1981 through 2012 related to the microbial colonization in the implant-abutment gap and its consequence in terms of crest bone loss and osseointegration. The following considerations could be put forward, with respect to the clinical importance of IAI: (a) the space present at the IAI seems to allow bacterial leakage to occur, in spite of the size of this space; (b) bacterial leakage seems to occur at the IAI, irrespective of the type of connection. More studies are necessary to clarify the relationship between leakage at IAI and abutment connection designs; (c) losses at the peri-implant bone crests cannot be related to the IAI size, since few studies have shown no relationship. Also, the microbial leakage at the IAI cannot be related to the bone crest loss, since there are no articles reporting this relationship; remains controversial the influence of the IAI position on the bone crest losses. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 101B: 1321-1328, 2013. Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationJournal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials
dc.relation3.373
dc.relation0,715
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectbone loss
dc.subjectimplant-abutment connection
dc.subjectimplant-abutment gap
dc.subjectmicrobial leakage
dc.subjectosseointegration
dc.subjectBone loss
dc.subjectConnection designs
dc.subjectLiterature reviews
dc.subjectMicrobial colonization
dc.subjectOsseointegration
dc.subjectTissue inflammation
dc.subjectBacteria
dc.subjectBone
dc.subjectAbutments (bridge)
dc.subjectalveolar bone loss
dc.subjectbacterial growth
dc.subjectbone density
dc.subjectbone regeneration
dc.subjectdental abutment
dc.subjectin vitro study
dc.subjectinflammation
dc.subjectMedline
dc.subjectmicrobial colonization
dc.subjectmouth cavity
dc.subjectnonhuman
dc.subjectosteolysis
dc.subjectreview
dc.titleImplant-abutment gap versus microbial colonization: Clinical significance based on a literature review
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución