dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorNorth Carolina State University
dc.contributorUniversity of California Davis
dc.contributorUniversidade de Brasília (UnB)
dc.contributorUniversity of Miami
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:30:04Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T18:55:56Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:30:04Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T18:55:56Z
dc.date.created2014-05-27T11:30:04Z
dc.date.issued2013-08-01
dc.identifierTrees - Structure and Function, v. 27, n. 4, p. 1139-1150, 2013.
dc.identifier0931-1890
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/76105
dc.identifier10.1007/s00468-013-0864-2
dc.identifierWOS:000321913500025
dc.identifier2-s2.0-84880643092
dc.identifier0588666172501665
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3925006
dc.description.abstractThe ecology of forest and savanna trees species will largely determine the structure and dynamics of the forest-savanna boundaries, but little is known about the constraints to leaf trait variation imposed by selective forces and evolutionary history during the process of savanna invasion by forest species. We compared seasonal patterns in leaf traits related to leaf structure, carbon assimilation, water, and nutrient relations in 10 congeneric species pairs, each containing one savanna species and one forest species. All individuals were growing in dystrophic oxisols in a fire-protected savanna of Central Brazil. We tested the hypothesis that forest species would be more constrained by seasonal drought and nutrient-poor soils than their savanna congeners. We also hypothesized that habitat, rather than phylogeny, would explain more of the interspecific variance in leaf traits of the studied species. We found that throughout the year forest trees had higher specific leaf area (SLA) but lower integrated water use efficiency than savanna trees. Forest and savanna species maintained similar values of predawn and midday leaf water potential along the year. Lower values were measured in the dry season. However, this was achieved by a stronger regulation of stomatal conductance and of CO2 assimilation on an area basis (A area) in forest trees, particularly toward the end of the dry season. Relative to savanna trees, forest trees maintained similar (P, K, Ca, and Mg) or slightly higher (N) leaf nutrient concentrations. For the majority of traits, more variance was explained by phylogeny, than by habitat of origin, with the exception of SLA, leaf N concentration, and A area, which were apparently subjected to different selective pressures in the savanna and forest environments. In conclusion, water shortage during extended droughts would be more limiting for forest trees than nutrient-poor soils. © 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationTrees: Structure and Function
dc.relation1.782
dc.relation0,726
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCarbon isotope discrimination
dc.subjectCerrado
dc.subjectLeaf functional traits
dc.subjectLeaf nutrients
dc.subjectSpecific leaf area
dc.subjectFunctional traits
dc.subjectCarbon
dc.subjectCarbon dioxide
dc.subjectDrought
dc.subjectEcosystems
dc.subjectIsotopes
dc.subjectNutrients
dc.subjectWater supply
dc.subjectForestry
dc.subjectCarbon Dioxide
dc.subjectLeaves
dc.subjectWater Supply
dc.titleSeasonal variation in leaf traits between congeneric savanna and forest trees in Central Brazil: Implications for forest expansion into savanna
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución