dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:29:04Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T18:49:29Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:29:04Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T18:49:29Z
dc.date.created2014-05-27T11:29:04Z
dc.date.issued2013-05-01
dc.identifierRevista Arvore, v. 37, n. 3, p. 531-538, 2013.
dc.identifier0100-6762
dc.identifier1806-9088
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/75285
dc.identifier10.1590/S0100-67622013000300016
dc.identifierS0100-67622013000300016
dc.identifierWOS:000324216600016
dc.identifier2-s2.0-84883470844
dc.identifier2-s2.0-84883470844.pdf
dc.identifier1889192227347351
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3924223
dc.description.abstractAcoustic Doppler current profilers are currently the main option for flow measurement and hydrodynamic monitoring of streams, replacing traditional methods. The spread of such equipment is mainly due to their operational advantages ranging from speed measurement to the greatest detail and amount of information generated about the hydrodynamics of hydrometric sections. As in the use of traditional methods and equipments, the use of acoustic Doppler profilers should be guided by the pursuit of data quality, since these are the basis for project and management of water resources constructions and systems. In this sense, the paper presents an analysis of measurement uncertainties of a hydrometric campaign held in Sapucaí River (Piranguinho-MG), using two different Doppler profilers - a Rio Grande ADCP 1200 kHz and a Qmetrix Qliner. 10 measurements were performed with each equipment consecutively, following the literature quality protocols, and later, a Type A uncertainty analysis (statistical analysis of several independent observations of the input under the same conditions). The measurements of the ADCP and Qliner presented, respectively, standard uncertainties of 0.679% and 0.508% compared with the averages. These results are satisfactory and acceptable when compared to references in the literature, indicating that the use of Doppler profilers is valid for expansion and upgrade of streamflow measurement networks and generation of hydrological data.
dc.languageeng
dc.languagepor
dc.relationRevista Árvore
dc.relation0.392
dc.relation0,458
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAcoustic Doppler current profilers
dc.subjectStreamflow measurement
dc.subjectUncertainty analyses
dc.titleQualidade de dados fluviométricos obtidos através de perfilamento acústico
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución