dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorUniversity Center of Araraquara-UNIARA
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:28:34Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T18:44:38Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:28:34Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T18:44:38Z
dc.date.created2014-05-27T11:28:34Z
dc.date.issued2013-03-01
dc.identifierJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, v. 71, n. 3, p. 505-512, 2013.
dc.identifier0278-2391
dc.identifier1531-5053
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/74676
dc.identifier10.1016/j.joms.2012.10.017
dc.identifierWOS:000316256900010
dc.identifier2-s2.0-84874108476
dc.identifier1566928219828056
dc.identifier8843503367647381
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3923628
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the effect of implant osteotomy on immediate bone cell viability, comparing guided surgery for implant placement with the classic drilling procedure. Materials and Methods: For this study, 20 rabbits were used. The animals were divided into a guided surgery group (GG) and a control group (CG) and were then divided into 4 subgroups - subgroups 1, 2, 3, and 4 - corresponding to drills used 10, 20, 30, and 40 times, respectively. All animals received 5 osteotomies in each tibia, by use of the classic drilling procedure in one tibia and guided surgery in the other tibia. The osteotomized areas were removed and processed immunohistochemically for detection of osteocalcin, receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL), osteoprotegerin (OPG), and caspase 3. Results: Immunohistochemical analysis showed that osteocalcin expression was initially higher in the CG and remained constant after drill reutilization. Although the expressions of RANKL and OPG were not statistically different for the GG and CG, the RANKL/OPG ratio tended to be higher for the GG. Moreover, caspase 3 expression was elevated in the GG, proportionally to the number of osteotomies, indicating an increase in the apoptosis index in the GG. Conclusions: The classic drilling procedure is more favorable to cell viability than guided surgery.© 2013 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
dc.relation1.779
dc.relation0,967
dc.relation0,967
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectcaspase 3
dc.subjectosteocalcin
dc.subjectosteoclast differentiation factor
dc.subjectosteoprotegerin
dc.subjectanimal cell
dc.subjectanimal experiment
dc.subjectapoptosis
dc.subjectbone cell
dc.subjectbone implant
dc.subjectbone matrix
dc.subjectbone tissue
dc.subjectcell viability
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectcortical bone
dc.subjectdrilling procedure
dc.subjectguided implant surgery
dc.subjectimmunohistochemistry
dc.subjectnonhuman
dc.subjectosteocyte
dc.subjectprotein expression
dc.subjectsurgical technique
dc.subjecttibia osteotomy
dc.subjectAnimals
dc.subjectBone and Bones
dc.subjectCaspase 3
dc.subjectCell Survival
dc.subjectDental Implantation, Endosseous
dc.subjectHot Temperature
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectModels, Anatomic
dc.subjectOsteocalcin
dc.subjectOsteoprotegerin
dc.subjectRabbits
dc.subjectRANK Ligand
dc.subjectSurgery, Computer-Assisted
dc.subjectTibia
dc.subjectTomography, X-Ray Computed
dc.titleGuided implant surgery: What is the influence of this new technique on bone cell viability?
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución