dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:28:34Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T18:44:33Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:28:34Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T18:44:33Z
dc.date.created2014-05-27T11:28:34Z
dc.date.issued2013-03-01
dc.identifierInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, v. 42, n. 3, p. 316-320, 2013.
dc.identifier0901-5027
dc.identifier1399-0020
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/74666
dc.identifier10.1016/j.ijom.2012.07.008
dc.identifierWOS:000315543800003
dc.identifier2-s2.0-84873989699
dc.identifier3933940257808182
dc.identifier8029177169916525
dc.identifier8547747556446020
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3923618
dc.description.abstractRecent studies have evaluated many methods of internal fixation for sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO), aiming to increase stability of the bone segments while minimizing condylar displacement. The purpose of this study was to evaluate, through biomechanical testing, the stability of the fixation comparing a specially designed bone plate to other two commonly used methods. Thirty hemimandibles were separated into three equal groups. All specimens received SSRO. In Group I the osteotomies were fixed with three 15 mm bicortical positional screws in an inverted-L pattern with an insertion angle of 90°. In Group II, fixation was carried out with a four-hole straight plate and four 6 mm monocortical screws. In Group III, fixation was performed with an adjustable sagittal plate and eight 6 mm monocortical screws. Hemimandibles were submitted to vertical compressive loads, by a mechanical testing unit. Averages and standard deviations were submitted to analysis of variance using the Tukey test with a 5% level of significance. Bicortical screws presented the greatest values of loading resistance. The adjustable miniplate demonstrated 60% lower resistance compared to bicortical screws. Group II presented on average 40% less resistant to the axial loading. © 2012 International Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
dc.relation2.164
dc.relation1,137
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectbiomechanical evaluation
dc.subjectrigid internal fixation
dc.subjectsagittal split ramus osteotomy
dc.subjectbiomechanics
dc.subjectbone plate
dc.subjectbone screw
dc.subjectclinical evaluation
dc.subjectin vitro study
dc.subjectosteosynthesis
dc.subjectsagittal split ramal osteotomy
dc.subjectBiomechanics
dc.subjectBone Plates
dc.subjectCompressive Strength
dc.subjectDental Stress Analysis
dc.subjectFracture Fixation, Internal
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectJaw Fixation Techniques
dc.subjectMandible
dc.subjectModels, Anatomic
dc.subjectOsteotomy, Sagittal Split Ramus
dc.subjectPolyurethanes
dc.titleIn vitro biomechanical evaluation of sagittal split osteotomy fixation with a specifically designed miniplate
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución