dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:27:29Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T18:40:59Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:27:29Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T18:40:59Z
dc.date.created2014-05-27T11:27:29Z
dc.date.issued2013-01-01
dc.identifierInternational Journal of Pest Management, v. 59, n. 1, p. 73-78, 2013.
dc.identifier0967-0874
dc.identifier1366-5863
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/74208
dc.identifier10.1080/09670874.2013.765057
dc.identifierWOS:000316061300009
dc.identifier2-s2.0-84874770822
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3923171
dc.description.abstractWe compared different cultivars and hybrids of crucifers in relation to development and life-history of diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella) to classify the plants according to their resistance to the pest. The plants used were Manteiga da Geórgia kale, Bola de Neve cauliflower, Ramoso Piracicaba Precoce broccoli, Chato-de-quintal cabbage, and the hybrid cabbages Midori, TPC668, TPC308, and TPC681. We evaluated performance daily until the pupal stage. Pupae were assessed individually to determine the pupal weight, performance, and pupal period. We determined the sex ratio, fecundity, fertility, and longevity of the emerged adults and calculated their reproductive potential. Cabbage hybrids TPC668, TPC308, and TPC681 do not support the development and reproduction of the diamondback moth. These hybrids show a level of resistance that is similar to that found the commercially available hybrid Midori and cultivar Chato de Quintal, which are known to be resistant to the diamondback moth. This finding implies that the capitata (cabbage) cultivars are the most suitable for planting because they are more resistant to pest than the cultivar's moth, acephala (kale). © 2013 Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationInternational Journal of Pest Management
dc.relation1.090
dc.relation0,413
dc.relation0,413
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBrassica oleraceae
dc.subjectcultivar resistance
dc.subjectPlutella xylostella
dc.subjectreproductive potential
dc.subjectcrop performance
dc.subjectcultivar
dc.subjectfecundity
dc.subjectfertility
dc.subjecthybrid
dc.subjectlife history
dc.subjectlongevity
dc.subjectmoth
dc.subjectpest control
dc.subjectpest resistance
dc.subjectplant
dc.subjectsex ratio
dc.subjectAcephala
dc.subjectBrassica
dc.subjectBrassica oleracea
dc.subjectBrassica oleracea var. botrytis
dc.subjectBrassica oleracea var. capitata
dc.subjectBrassica oleracea var. italica
dc.subjectBrassicaceae
dc.subjectCapitata
dc.subjectLepidoptera
dc.subjectPlutellidae
dc.titleClassification of crucifer cultivars based on the life-history of diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella)
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución