dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorUniversidade Federal de Goiás (UFG)
dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:27:05Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T18:36:29Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:27:05Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T18:36:29Z
dc.date.created2014-05-27T11:27:05Z
dc.date.issued2012-10-01
dc.identifierBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences, v. 11, n. 4, p. 486-491, 2012.
dc.identifier1677-3217
dc.identifier1677-3225
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/73624
dc.identifier10.1590/S1677-32252012000400011
dc.identifierS1677-32252012000400011
dc.identifier2-s2.0-84874404634
dc.identifier2-s2.0-84874404634.pdf
dc.identifier5608176301307207
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3922615
dc.description.abstractAim: This study analyzed and compared the experience of dental caries in 300 children aged 0 to 48 months, who were participants and non-participants of a preventive program 'Dentistry for babies', as well as the correlation between assiduity of dental visits and experience of dental caries. Methods: The subjects were randomly selected and divided into two groups: G1 'Non participant children of the Program' (n=100) and G2 'Participant Children of the Program' (n=200). Each group was subdivided in two subgroups: 0-24 months and 25-48 months. The collected data from G2 were analyzed, relating the variation of the dmft index (dmft refers to primary teeth: d = decayed, m = missing/extracted due to caries, f = filled, t = teeth) (C) and dental caries prevalence (P) with the influence of assiduity factor in each subgroup. To collect data, clinical examinations were performed using tactile and visual criteria by a single calibrated examiner. The data were statistically analyzed using the 'paired t-test', 'Mann-Whitney' and 'Chi-Squared' tests (p<0.05). Results: It was found that prevalence and dmft index were statistically significant (P=0.0001) with the greatest values observed in G1 (p=0.0001). The values were: PG1 (73%), PG2 (22%), CG1 (3.45±3.84), CG2 (0.66±1.57). Assiduity was significant in G2 (p=0.0001). The values observed were: P-Assiduous (2%), P-Non-assiduous (42%), C-Assiduous (0.04±0.31), and C-Non-assiduous (1.29±2.01). Conclusions: The participation in the program had a positive influence on the oral health of babies. Complete assiduity to the program resulted in the lowest rates and prevalence of dental caries.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
dc.relation0,131
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectDental care
dc.subjectDental caries
dc.subjectEpidemiology
dc.subjectPediatric dentistry
dc.subjectReferral and consultation
dc.titleDentistry for babies: Caries experience vs. Assiduity in clinical care
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución