dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:25:56Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T18:27:46Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:25:56Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T18:27:46Z
dc.date.created2014-05-27T11:25:56Z
dc.date.issued2011-07-06
dc.identifierBrazilian Dental Journal, v. 22, n. 3, p. 185-192, 2011.
dc.identifier0103-6440
dc.identifier1806-4760
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/72556
dc.identifier10.1590/S0103-64402011000300002
dc.identifierS0103-64402011000300002
dc.identifier2-s2.0-79959813711
dc.identifier2-s2.0-79959813711.pdf
dc.identifier9531839078426485
dc.identifier6100859465871929
dc.identifier3534044399884035
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3921607
dc.description.abstractThis study used scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to evaluate the morphology and adhesion of blood components on root surfaces instrumented by curettes, piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler and Er,Cr:YSGG laser. One hundred samples from 25 teeth were divided into 5 groups: 1) Curettes; 2) Piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler; 3) Curettes plus piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler; 4) Er,Cr:YSGG laser; 5) Curettes plus Er,Cr:YSGG laser. Ten samples from each group were used for analysis of root morphology and the other 10 were used for analysis of adhesion of blood components on root surface. The results were analyzed statistically by the Kruskall-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests with a significance level of 5%. The group treated with curettes showed smoother surfaces when compared to the groups were instrumented with piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler and the Er,Cr:YSGG laser. The surfaces instrumented with piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler and Er,Cr:YSGG laser, alone or in combination with hand scaling and root planing, did not differ significantly (p>0.05) among themselves. No statistically significant differences (p>0.05) among groups were found as to the adhesion of blood components on root surface. Ultrasonic instrumentation and Er,Cr:YSGG irradiation produced rougher root surfaces than the use of curettes, but there were no differences among treatments with respect to the adhesion of blood components.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationBrazilian Dental Journal
dc.relation0,476
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectDental scaling
dc.subjectLaser
dc.subjectRegeneration
dc.subjectUltrasonic
dc.subjectfibrin
dc.subjectblood cell
dc.subjectcell adhesion
dc.subjectcomparative study
dc.subjectcytology
dc.subjectdental surgery
dc.subjectdentin
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectinstrumentation
dc.subjectlow level laser therapy
dc.subjectmethodology
dc.subjectperiodontics
dc.subjectphysiology
dc.subjectpiezosurgery
dc.subjectpreventive dentistry
dc.subjectradiation exposure
dc.subjectscanning electron microscopy
dc.subjectsolid state laser
dc.subjecttooth root
dc.subjectultrastructure
dc.subjectBlood Cells
dc.subjectCell Adhesion
dc.subjectDental Scaling
dc.subjectDentin
dc.subjectFibrin
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectLaser Therapy, Low-Level
dc.subjectLasers, Solid-State
dc.subjectMicroscopy, Electron, Scanning
dc.subjectPiezosurgery
dc.subjectRoot Planing
dc.subjectSmear Layer
dc.subjectSubgingival Curettage
dc.subjectTooth Root
dc.titleEffect of instrumentation using curettes, piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler and er,cr:Ysgg laser on the morphology and adhesion of blood components on root surfaces - A SEM study
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución