dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:25:27Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T18:25:47Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:25:27Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T18:25:47Z
dc.date.created2014-05-27T11:25:27Z
dc.date.issued2011-01-01
dc.identifierMinerva stomatologica, v. 60, n. 1-2, p. 15-23, 2011.
dc.identifier0026-4970
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/72292
dc.identifier2-s2.0-79960623909
dc.identifier0000-0003-2386-842X
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3921371
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this paper was to compare the dentin-pulp complex response to cavity preparation in human teeth using ultrasonic chemical vapor deposition (CVD) diamond tip and high-speed diamond bur. Class V buccal cavities were randomly prepared in 40 premolars from 14 patients aged 11 to 15 years. The cutting time was recorded and the cavities had the axial walls protected with gutta-percha and were filled with glass ionomer cement. The teeth were extracted at intervals of 0, 5, 10 and 20 days, and were decalcified, sectioned and stained by Hematoxylin & Eosin, Masson's Trichrome and Brown & Brenn techniques. The inflammatory response and cell disorganization were blindly evaluated by two examiners. The remaining dentin thickness (RDT) was measured by a linear scale using computer software. Statistical analysis by one-way ANOVA showed no statistically significant difference (P≤0.05) among the cavities prepared with either type of instrument, with mean RDT of 1132.50 mm. Cutting time and the pulp-dentin complex responses were analyzed statistically by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests (P≤0.05). The ultrasonic CVD diamond tip took 5 times longer to prepare the cavities and there were no typical inflammatory pulp responses in cavities prepared with either type of cutting instrument, only mild to moderate cell disorganization was present. Even taking longer to cut the dental substrate, the ultrasonic CVD diamond tip produced similar pulp response compared to the conventional high-speed diamond bur.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationMinerva stomatologica
dc.relation0,301
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectdiamond
dc.subjectglass ionomer
dc.subjectgutta percha
dc.subjectadolescent
dc.subjectchild
dc.subjectclinical trial
dc.subjectcomparative study
dc.subjectcontrolled clinical trial
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectdental equipment
dc.subjectdental surgery
dc.subjectdentin
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectinflammation
dc.subjectinstrumentation
dc.subjectodontometry
dc.subjectpremolar tooth
dc.subjectsingle blind procedure
dc.subjectstaining
dc.subjecttime
dc.subjecttooth extraction
dc.subjecttooth pulp
dc.subjectultrasound
dc.subjectultrastructure
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectBicuspid
dc.subjectChild
dc.subjectDental Cavity Preparation
dc.subjectDental High-Speed Equipment
dc.subjectDental Pulp Cavity
dc.subjectDentin
dc.subjectDiamond
dc.subjectGlass Ionomer Cements
dc.subjectGutta-Percha
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectInflammation
dc.subjectOdontometry
dc.subjectSingle-Blind Method
dc.subjectStaining and Labeling
dc.subjectTime Factors
dc.subjectTooth Extraction
dc.subjectUltrasonics
dc.titleEvaluation of the dentin-pulp complex after cavity preparation with ultrasonic diamond tip
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución