dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorFederal University of Rio Grande do Sul
dc.contributorPrivate Practice
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:24:50Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T18:23:17Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:24:50Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T18:23:17Z
dc.date.created2014-05-27T11:24:50Z
dc.date.issued2010-11-30
dc.identifierBrazilian Dental Journal, v. 21, n. 4, p. 310-314, 2010.
dc.identifier0103-6440
dc.identifier1806-4760
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/71976
dc.identifier10.1590/S0103-64402010000400004
dc.identifierS0103-64402010000400004
dc.identifier2-s2.0-78649360996
dc.identifier2-s2.0-78649360996.pdf
dc.identifier1627568419811788
dc.identifier1411074363039082
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3921086
dc.description.abstractThis study evaluated the efficacy of 2 types of rotary instruments employed in association with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) or EDTA in removing calcium hydroxide (CH) residues from root canals dentin walls. Forty-two mandibular human incisors were instrumented with the ProTaper System up to F2 instrument, irrigated with 2.5% NaOCl followed by 17% EDTA and filled with a CH intracanal dressing. After 7 days, the CH dressing was removed using 4 techniques: NiTi rotary instrument size 25, 0.06 taper (K3 Endo) and irrigation with 17% EDTA (Group 1), NiTi rotary F1 instrument (ProTaper) and irrigation with 17% EDTA (Group 2), NiTi rotary instrument size 25, 0.06 taper and irrigation with 2.5% NaOCl (Group 3) and NiTi rotary F1 instrument and irrigation with 2.5% NaOCl (Group 4). Two roots without intracanal dressing were used as negative controls. Teeth were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy, in the cervical and apical canal thirds. None of the techniques removed the CH dressing completely. In the apical and cervical thirds, F1 instrument was better than instrument size 25, 0.06 taper in removing CH residues (p<0.05), regardless of the final irrigating solution. No difference was found between the irrigating solutions in the groups of F1 instrument and of instrument size 25, 0.06 taper (p>0.05). The negative controls had no CH residues on the dentin walls. In conclusion, the ProTaper F1 instrument was better than K3 Endo instrument size 25, 0.06 taper in the removal of CH intracanal medication, regardless of irrigating solution used.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationBrazilian Dental Journal
dc.relation0,476
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCalcium hydroxide
dc.subjectEDTA
dc.subjectIntracanal dressing
dc.subjectRotary instruments
dc.subjectSodium hypochlorite
dc.subjectbiomedical and dental materials
dc.subjectcalcium hydroxide
dc.subjectedetic acid
dc.subjecthypochlorite sodium
dc.subjectroot canal filling material
dc.subjectchemistry
dc.subjectcomparative study
dc.subjectdental equipment
dc.subjectendodontics
dc.subjectequipment design
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectincisor
dc.subjectinstrumentation
dc.subjectlavage
dc.subjectmandible
dc.subjectmethodology
dc.subjectnonparametric test
dc.subjecttooth pulp
dc.subjectultrastructure
dc.subjectCalcium Hydroxide
dc.subjectDental Instruments
dc.subjectDental Pulp Cavity
dc.subjectEdetic Acid
dc.subjectEquipment Design
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectIncisor
dc.subjectMandible
dc.subjectRoot Canal Filling Materials
dc.subjectRoot Canal Irrigants
dc.subjectRoot Canal Preparation
dc.subjectSodium Hypochlorite
dc.subjectStatistics, Nonparametric
dc.subjectTherapeutic Irrigation
dc.titleCalcium hydroxide intracanal dressing removal with different rotary instruments and irrigating solutions: A scanning electron microscopy study
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución