dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:24:43Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T18:21:37Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:24:43Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T18:21:37Z
dc.date.created2014-05-27T11:24:43Z
dc.date.issued2010-07-01
dc.identifierBrazilian Oral Research, v. 24, n. 3, p. 316-322, 2010.
dc.identifier1806-8324
dc.identifier1807-3107
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/71756
dc.identifier10.1590/S1806-83242010000300010
dc.identifierS1806-83242010000300010
dc.identifier2-s2.0-77957944019
dc.identifier2-s2.0-77957944019.pdf
dc.identifier3534044399884035
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3920885
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of brushing with a Colgate 360° or Oral B Indicator 35 toothbrush on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to extracted human teeth. The bristle wear and bristle tip morphology were also examined after simulated tooth-brushing. Orthodontic brackets (Roth-P/1 st and 2 nd pre-molar S/D- Slot 0.18) were bonded (Transbond XT ®) to the smoothest surface of each of 45 extracted human molar and premolar teeth. Test specimens were randomly divided into three groups: Group 1, control group with no brushing; Group 2, brushing with the Oral B Indicator 35; Group 3, brushing with the Colgate 360°. Samples were adapted to a machine that simulated tooth-brushing. The bond strength of each bracket to each tooth was assessed with a mechanical testing machine. The bristle wear and bristle tip morphology indices were also assessed. Statistically significant differences were defined for p ≤ 0.05. The average bond strengths (range: 90.18-90.89 kgf/cm 2) did not differ among the three groups. The Colgate 360° showed less bristle wear and a better bristle tip morphology than the Oral B Indicator 35 toothbrush. However, use of either toothbrush did not decrease the bond strength of the orthodontic brackets. Therefore, patients undergoing orthodontic therapy can safely use either toothbrush.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationBrazilian Oral Research
dc.relation1.223
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectOrthodontic brackets
dc.subjectPrimary prevention
dc.subjectToothbrushing
dc.subjectresin cement
dc.subjectdental bonding
dc.subjectdental care
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectinstrumentation
dc.subjectmechanical stress
dc.subjectmethodology
dc.subjectnonparametric test
dc.subjectorthodontic device
dc.subjectshear strength
dc.subjecttooth brushing
dc.subjectDental Bonding
dc.subjectDental Stress Analysis
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectOrthodontic Brackets
dc.subjectResin Cements
dc.subjectShear Strength
dc.subjectStatistics, Nonparametric
dc.subjectStress, Mechanical
dc.titleEffect of toothbrushing with different manual toothbrushes on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución