dc.contributor | Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-05-27T11:24:43Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-05T18:21:37Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-05-27T11:24:43Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-10-05T18:21:37Z | |
dc.date.created | 2014-05-27T11:24:43Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010-07-01 | |
dc.identifier | Brazilian Oral Research, v. 24, n. 3, p. 316-322, 2010. | |
dc.identifier | 1806-8324 | |
dc.identifier | 1807-3107 | |
dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/71756 | |
dc.identifier | 10.1590/S1806-83242010000300010 | |
dc.identifier | S1806-83242010000300010 | |
dc.identifier | 2-s2.0-77957944019 | |
dc.identifier | 2-s2.0-77957944019.pdf | |
dc.identifier | 3534044399884035 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3920885 | |
dc.description.abstract | The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of brushing with a Colgate 360° or Oral B Indicator 35 toothbrush on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to extracted human teeth. The bristle wear and bristle tip morphology were also examined after simulated tooth-brushing. Orthodontic brackets (Roth-P/1 st and 2 nd pre-molar S/D- Slot 0.18) were bonded (Transbond XT ®) to the smoothest surface of each of 45 extracted human molar and premolar teeth. Test specimens were randomly divided into three groups: Group 1, control group with no brushing; Group 2, brushing with the Oral B Indicator 35; Group 3, brushing with the Colgate 360°. Samples were adapted to a machine that simulated tooth-brushing. The bond strength of each bracket to each tooth was assessed with a mechanical testing machine. The bristle wear and bristle tip morphology indices were also assessed. Statistically significant differences were defined for p ≤ 0.05. The average bond strengths (range: 90.18-90.89 kgf/cm 2) did not differ among the three groups. The Colgate 360° showed less bristle wear and a better bristle tip morphology than the Oral B Indicator 35 toothbrush. However, use of either toothbrush did not decrease the bond strength of the orthodontic brackets. Therefore, patients undergoing orthodontic therapy can safely use either toothbrush. | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.relation | Brazilian Oral Research | |
dc.relation | 1.223 | |
dc.rights | Acesso aberto | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.subject | Orthodontic brackets | |
dc.subject | Primary prevention | |
dc.subject | Toothbrushing | |
dc.subject | resin cement | |
dc.subject | dental bonding | |
dc.subject | dental care | |
dc.subject | human | |
dc.subject | instrumentation | |
dc.subject | mechanical stress | |
dc.subject | methodology | |
dc.subject | nonparametric test | |
dc.subject | orthodontic device | |
dc.subject | shear strength | |
dc.subject | tooth brushing | |
dc.subject | Dental Bonding | |
dc.subject | Dental Stress Analysis | |
dc.subject | Humans | |
dc.subject | Orthodontic Brackets | |
dc.subject | Resin Cements | |
dc.subject | Shear Strength | |
dc.subject | Statistics, Nonparametric | |
dc.subject | Stress, Mechanical | |
dc.title | Effect of toothbrushing with different manual toothbrushes on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets | |
dc.type | Artigo | |