dc.contributorCentro de Fertilização Assistida
dc.contributorUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributorInstituto Sapientiae
dc.contributorUniversity of Queesland
dc.contributorClínica Step 01
dc.contributorIrmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo
dc.contributorFaculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo
dc.contributorFederacao Brasileira Das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia
dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:24:40Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T18:20:58Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:24:40Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T18:20:58Z
dc.date.created2014-05-27T11:24:40Z
dc.date.issued2010-04-01
dc.identifierJornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida, v. 14, n. 2, p. 32-35, 2010.
dc.identifier1517-5693
dc.identifier1518-0557
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/71648
dc.identifier2-s2.0-77956276931
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3920801
dc.description.abstractObjective: The objective of this study was evaluate if the embryos cryopreservation from OHSS patients Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) cycles could be influence the clinical outcomes when compared to patients who receive oocytes from donors but the endometrium was not prepared and the embryos were cryopreserved. Methods: Fifty eight couples submitted to ICSI cycles in which 26 with OHSS clinical manifestation (OHSS group) and 32 couples who have received oocytes from donors (control group). The embryos were frozen on day+2 or +3of development. All patients included in this study had embryos crypreserved before the transfer, and in the thawing cycle, only the endometrium preparation was performed. The embryo survival, implantation, pregnancy and miscarriage rates were evaluated in the embryo thawing cycle. Results: There was no difference among the groups in relation to fertilization rate (OHSS: 71.89% ± 15.45, Control: 79.75% ± 21.68, p= 0.234), survival embryos rate (OHSS: 68.85 ± 21.10, Control: 59.53 ± 36.79, p= 0.233), high quality embryos rate (OHSS: 25.20 ± 23.90, Control: 27.40 ± 30.30, p= 0.760), implantation rate (OHSS: 17.9 ± 26.9, Control: 12.5 ± 23.7, p= 0.435), pregnancy rate (OHSS: 38.50, Control: 28.60, p= 0.441) and miscarriage rate (OHSS: 40.00, Control: 25.00, p= 0.332). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that clinical outcomes in freeze and thawing cycles were not affected by the presence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome clinical manifestation after controlled ovarian stimulation.
dc.languagepor
dc.relationJornal Brasileiro de Reproducao Assistida
dc.relation0,282
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectEmbryo implantation
dc.subjectOvarian hyperstimulation syndrome
dc.subjectPregnancy rate
dc.subjectSperm injections, intracytoplasmic
dc.subjectclinical article
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectcryopreservation
dc.subjectembryo
dc.subjectembryo development
dc.subjectembryo transfer
dc.subjectendometrium
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectfertilization
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectintracytoplasmic sperm injection
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectnidation
dc.subjectoocyte donation
dc.subjectoutcome assessment
dc.subjectovary hyperstimulation
dc.subjectpregnancy rate
dc.subjectspontaneous abortion
dc.subjectthawing
dc.titleA síndrome do hiperestímulo ovariano não influencia os resultados clínicos após ciclos de descongelamento de embriões provenientes de ciclos de ICSI
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución