dc.contributor | Educational Foundation of Barretos (UNIFEB) | |
dc.contributor | Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-05-27T11:24:35Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-05T18:19:58Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-05-27T11:24:35Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-10-05T18:19:58Z | |
dc.date.created | 2014-05-27T11:24:35Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009-12-28 | |
dc.identifier | Brazilian Oral Research, v. 23, n. 3, p. 307-312, 2009. | |
dc.identifier | 1806-8324 | |
dc.identifier | 1807-3107 | |
dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/71495 | |
dc.identifier | 10.1590/S1806-83242009000300014 | |
dc.identifier | S1806-83242009000300014 | |
dc.identifier | 2-s2.0-72449196993 | |
dc.identifier | 2-s2.0-72449196993.pdf | |
dc.identifier | 3534044399884035 | |
dc.identifier | 2628593693450121 | |
dc.identifier | 6100859465871929 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3920680 | |
dc.description.abstract | In a previous study, we evaluated the findings related to the use of resorbable collagen membranes in humans along with DFDBA (demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft). The aim of this subsequent study was to histometrically evaluate in dogs, the healing response of gingival recessions treated with collagen membrane + DFDBA (Guided Tissue Regeneration, GTR) compared to a coronally positioned flap (CPF). Two types of treatment were randomly carried out in a split-mouth study. Group 1 was considered as test (GTR: collagen membrane + DFDBA), whereas Group 2 stood for the control (only CPF). The dogs were given chemical bacterial plaque control with 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate during a 90-day repair period. Afterwards, the animals were killed to obtain biopsies and histometric evaluation of the process of cementum and bone formation, epithelial migration and gingival level. A statistically significant difference was found between groups with a larger extension of neoformed cementum (GTR = 32.72%; CPF = 18.82%; p = 0.0004), new bone (GTR = 23.20%; CPF = 09.90%; p = 0.0401) and with a smaller area of residual gingival recession in the test group (GTR = 50.69%; CPF = 59.73%; p = 0.0055) compared to the control group. The only item assessed that showed no statistical difference was epithelial proliferation on the root surface, with means of 15.14% for the GTR group and 20.34% for the CPF group (p = 0.0890). Within the limits of this study we concluded that the treatment of gingival recession defects with GTR, associating collagen membrane with DFDBA, showed better outcomes in terms of a larger extension of neoformed cementum and bone, as well as in terms of a smaller proportion of residual recessions. | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.relation | Brazilian Oral Research | |
dc.relation | 1.223 | |
dc.rights | Acesso aberto | |
dc.source | Scopus | |
dc.subject | Comparative | |
dc.subject | Gingival recession | |
dc.subject | Guided tissue regeneration | |
dc.subject | Histology | |
dc.subject | Reconstructive surgical procedures | |
dc.subject | collagen | |
dc.subject | animal | |
dc.subject | artificial membrane | |
dc.subject | bone transplantation | |
dc.subject | comparative study | |
dc.subject | dog | |
dc.subject | freeze drying | |
dc.subject | gingiva disease | |
dc.subject | histology | |
dc.subject | methodology | |
dc.subject | pathology | |
dc.subject | periodontics | |
dc.subject | wound healing | |
dc.subject | Animals | |
dc.subject | Bone Demineralization Technique | |
dc.subject | Bone Transplantation | |
dc.subject | Collagen | |
dc.subject | Dogs | |
dc.subject | Freeze Drying | |
dc.subject | Gingival Recession | |
dc.subject | Guided Tissue Regeneration, Periodontal | |
dc.subject | Membranes, Artificial | |
dc.subject | Wound Healing | |
dc.title | Treatment of gingival recession with collagen membrane and DFDBA: A histometric study in dogs | |
dc.type | Artigo | |