dc.contributorInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)
dc.contributorAMR-CTA - Pça
dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:23:45Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T18:14:33Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:23:45Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T18:14:33Z
dc.date.created2014-05-27T11:23:45Z
dc.date.issued2008-12-01
dc.identifierMaterials Science Forum, v. 591-593, p. 572-577.
dc.identifier0255-5476
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/70736
dc.identifier10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.591-593.572
dc.identifier2-s2.0-58149123305
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3920002
dc.description.abstractThere has been a great interest for improving the machining of cast iron materials in the automotive and other industries. Comparative studies for tool used to machine grey cast iron (CI) and compacted graphite iron (CGI) on dry machining were also performed in order to find out why in this case the tool lifetime is not significantly higher. However the machining these materials while considering turning with the traditional high-speed steel and carbide cutting tools present any disadvantages. One of these disadvantages is that all the traditional machining processes involve the cooling fluid to remove the heat generated on workpiece due to friction during cutting. This paper present a new generation of ceramic cutting tool exhibiting improved properties and important advances in machining CI and CGI. The tool performance was analyzed in function of flank wear, temperature and roughness, while can be observed that main effects were found for tool wear, were abrasion to CI and inter-diffusion of constituting elements between tool and CGI, causing crater. However the difference in tool lifetime can be explained by the formation of a MnS layer on the tool surface in the case of grey CI. This layer is missing in the case of CGI.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationMaterials Science Forum
dc.relation0,180
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCompacted graphite iron
dc.subjectDry machining
dc.subjectGray cast iron
dc.subjectMachining
dc.subjectSi3N4
dc.subjectCast iron materials
dc.subjectComparative studies
dc.subjectCooling fluids
dc.subjectFlank wears
dc.subjectGrey cast irons
dc.subjectMachining processes
dc.subjectMain effects
dc.subjectNew generations
dc.subjectSiN
dc.subjectTool lifetimes
dc.subjectTool performances
dc.subjectTool surfaces
dc.subjectTool wears
dc.subjectWork pieces
dc.subjectCarbides
dc.subjectCeramic cutting tools
dc.subjectCeramic tools
dc.subjectCutting tools
dc.subjectGraphite
dc.subjectIron
dc.subjectMachine tools
dc.subjectMetal casting
dc.subjectMetal working tools
dc.subjectNitrides
dc.subjectPowders
dc.subjectSilicon nitride
dc.subjectTurning
dc.subjectCast iron
dc.titleComparative study on turning CI and CGI using silicon nitride cutting tools
dc.typeTrabalho apresentado em evento


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución