dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:23:44Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T18:14:27Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:23:44Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T18:14:27Z
dc.date.created2014-05-27T11:23:44Z
dc.date.issued2008-12-01
dc.identifierBrazilian Oral Research, v. 22, n. 4, p. 346-351, 2008.
dc.identifier1806-8324
dc.identifier1807-3107
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/70723
dc.identifier10.1590/S1806-83242008000400011
dc.identifierS1806-83242008000400011
dc.identifier2-s2.0-60649119644
dc.identifier2-s2.0-60649119644.pdf
dc.identifier8235700830441386
dc.identifier0450226572005125
dc.identifier9300670753766517
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3919989
dc.description.abstractSince bovine teeth have been used as substitutes for human teeth in in vitro dental studies, the aim of this study was to compare the radiographic density of bovine teeth with that of human teeth to evaluate their usability for radiographic studies. Thirty bovine and twenty human teeth were cut transversally in 1 millimeter-thick slices. The slices were X-rayed using a digital radiographic system and an intraoral X-ray machine at 65 kVp and 7 mA. The exposure time (0.08 s) and the target-sensor distance (40 cm) were standardized for all the radiographs. The radiographic densities of the enamel, coronal dentin and radicular dentin of each slice were obtained separately using the histogram tool of Adobe Photoshop 7.0 software. The mean radiographic densities of the enamel, coronal dentin and radicular dentin were calculated by the arithmetic mean of the slices of each tooth. One-way ANOVA demonstrated statistically significant differences for the densities of bovine and human enamel (p < 0.05) and for bovine and human coronal dentin (p < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found for the bovine and human radicular dentin (p > 0.05). Based on the results, the authors concluded that: a) the radiographic density of bovine enamel is significantly higher than that of human enamel; b) the radiodensity of bovine coronal dentin is statistically lower than the radiodensity of human coronal dentin; bovine radicular dentin is also less radiodense than human radicular dentin, although this difference was not statistically significant; c) bovine teeth should be used with care in radiographic in vitro studies.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationBrazilian Oral Research
dc.relation1.223
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectCattle
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectRadiography, dental
dc.subjectTooth
dc.subjectX-Rays
dc.subjectanalysis of variance
dc.subjectanimal
dc.subjectanimal model
dc.subjectcattle
dc.subjectcomparative study
dc.subjectdentin
dc.subjectenamel
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectphysiology
dc.subjectradiography
dc.subjecttooth
dc.subjecttooth radiography
dc.subjectX ray
dc.subjectAnalysis of Variance
dc.subjectAnimals
dc.subjectDental Enamel
dc.subjectDentin
dc.subjectModels, Animal
dc.subjectRadiography, Dental, Digital
dc.titleComparative analysis of human and bovine teeth: Radiographic density
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución