dc.contributorUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:23:41Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T18:13:45Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:23:41Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T18:13:45Z
dc.date.created2014-05-27T11:23:41Z
dc.date.issued2008-11-01
dc.identifierElectromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology, v. 48, n. 8, p. 367-372, 2008.
dc.identifier0301-150X
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/70629
dc.identifier2-s2.0-57049133039
dc.identifier7607651111619269
dc.identifier5919252907988514
dc.identifier0000-0001-8001-301X
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3919902
dc.description.abstractIt was purposed the use of electromyography (EMG) to evaluate the activation of the agonists and antagonists muscles of spastic patients, to test the viability in the development of an instrument that given quantitative data of the patient spasticity. 30 hemiplegic and 15 normal volunteers had been submitted to the EMG of flexor and extensor carpi ulnaris muscles during the flexion and extension movements of the wrist. The individuals with less severe spasticity (mAS (modified Ashworth Scale) ringing 0 to 3 degree), had presented deficit in the activation of the flexor muscles in plegic side in relation to the non plegic side and that the individuals seriously compromised by the spasticity (mAS = 4 degree) present deficit of reciprocal inhibition. One evidenced is that the non plegic member does not present a similar neuro-motor comportment when compared to the normal member. The surface electromyography is a practical clinical instrument to evaluate the patient with spasticity and the hemiplegic patient needs to be evaluated on both sides (deficient and no deficient) because the no compromised side do not show a normality standard.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationElectromyography and Clinical Neurophysiology
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAgonist-antagonist relationship
dc.subjectHemiplegia
dc.subjectSpasticity
dc.subjectSurface electromyography
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectclinical article
dc.subjectclinical effectiveness
dc.subjectcomparative study
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectdisease severity
dc.subjectelectromyography
dc.subjectevidence based practice
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectflexor muscle
dc.subjectforearm
dc.subjecthemiplegia
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectjoint limitation
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmotoneuron
dc.subjectquantitative analysis
dc.subjectrating scale
dc.subjectspasticity
dc.subjectwrist
dc.subjectAged
dc.subjectElectromyography
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectForearm
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMiddle Aged
dc.subjectMovement
dc.subjectMuscle Contraction
dc.subjectMuscle Spasticity
dc.subjectMuscle, Skeletal
dc.titleComparative analysis of electromyographic pattern in the forearm muscles of hemiplegic patients
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución