Comparação entre trȩs métodos para estimar lâminas de irrigação

dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:22:45Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T18:10:58Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:22:45Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T18:10:58Z
dc.date.created2014-05-27T11:22:45Z
dc.date.issued2008-01-01
dc.identifierIrriga, v. 13, n. 1, p. 36-46, 2008.
dc.identifier1413-7895
dc.identifier1808-3765
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/70231
dc.identifier2-s2.0-43549117737
dc.identifier2-s2.0-43549117737.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3919571
dc.description.abstractAn experiment with four treatments was carried out on the experimental area of ADEI to compare three methods of water use requirement: ETc (T1) - irrigation based on crop evapotranspiration (ETc); Tensiometers (T2 and T3) - irrigations were made through reading of tensiometers installed at 40 cm deep and, Control (T4) - only one irrigation to promote the seedlings emergence. Both Class A pan and soil water depletion methods presented good results when the crop was developed without restraint of water. The Katerji method can be utilized in conditions of water restriction. Irrigation frequency was more important than amount of applied water for higher yield.
dc.languagepor
dc.relationIrriga
dc.relation0,283
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectClass A pan
dc.subjectKaterji method
dc.subjectTensiometer
dc.subjectWater depletion
dc.subjectCrops
dc.subjectEvapotranspiration
dc.subjectIrrigation
dc.subjectSeed
dc.subjectWater management
dc.subjectcomparative study
dc.subjectcrop yield
dc.subjectestimation method
dc.subjectevapotranspiration
dc.subjectexperimental study
dc.subjectirrigation
dc.subjectseedling emergence
dc.subjectsoil water
dc.subjecttensiometer
dc.subjectwater supply
dc.subjectwater use
dc.titleComparação entre trȩs métodos para estimar lâminas de irrigação
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución