dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:22:39Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T18:09:24Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:22:39Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T18:09:24Z
dc.date.created2014-05-27T11:22:39Z
dc.date.issued2007-12-01
dc.identifierInternational Association of Geodesy Symposia, v. 130, p. 166-171.
dc.identifier0939-9585
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/70005
dc.identifier10.1007/978-3-540-49350-1_26
dc.identifierWOS:000245419400026
dc.identifier2-s2.0-70349589859
dc.identifier7180879644760038
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3919365
dc.description.abstractThe GPS observables are subject to several errors. Among them, the systematic ones have great impact, because they degrade the accuracy of the accomplished positioning. These errors are those related, mainly, to GPS satellites orbits, multipath and atmospheric effects. Lately, a method has been suggested to mitigate these errors: the semiparametric model and the penalised least squares technique (PLS). In this method, the errors are modeled as functions varying smoothly in time. It is like to change the stochastic model, in which the errors functions are incorporated, the results obtained are similar to those in which the functional model is changed. As a result, the ambiguities and the station coordinates are estimated with better reliability and accuracy than the conventional least square method (CLS). In general, the solution requires a shorter data interval, minimizing costs. The method performance was analyzed in two experiments, using data from single frequency receivers. The first one was accomplished with a short baseline, where the main error was the multipath. In the second experiment, a baseline of 102 km was used. In this case, the predominant errors were due to the ionosphere and troposphere refraction. In the first experiment, using 5 minutes of data collection, the largest coordinates discrepancies in relation to the ground truth reached 1.6 cm and 3.3 cm in h coordinate for PLS and the CLS, respectively, in the second one, also using 5 minutes of data, the discrepancies were 27 cm in h for the PLS and 175 cm in h for the CLS. In these tests, it was also possible to verify a considerable improvement in the ambiguities resolution using the PLS in relation to the CLS, with a reduced data collection time interval. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationInternational Association of Geodesy Symposia
dc.relation0,403
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectFunctional and Stochastic models
dc.subjectPenalised least squares
dc.subjectSystematic errors
dc.subjectAtmospheric effects
dc.subjectLeast Square
dc.subjectLeast square methods
dc.subjectLeast squares techniques
dc.subjectRelative positioning
dc.subjectSemi-parametric modeling
dc.subjectSingle-frequency receivers
dc.subjectTroposphere refraction
dc.subjectData acquisition
dc.subjectErrors
dc.subjectExperiments
dc.subjectGeodesy
dc.subjectGeodetic satellites
dc.subjectIonosphere
dc.subjectLeast squares approximations
dc.subjectStochastic models
dc.subjectTools
dc.subjectGlobal positioning system
dc.titleModifying the stochastic model to mitigate GPS systematic errors in relative positioning
dc.typeTrabalho apresentado em evento


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución