dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorLutheran University of Brazil
dc.contributorPontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:22:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T18:05:47Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:22:23Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T18:05:47Z
dc.date.created2014-05-27T11:22:23Z
dc.date.issued2007-01-01
dc.identifierBrazilian Oral Research, v. 21, n. 1, p. 58-63, 2007.
dc.identifier1806-8324
dc.identifier1807-3107
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/69483
dc.identifier10.1590/S1806-83242007000100010
dc.identifierS1806-83242007000100010
dc.identifier2-s2.0-34147118230
dc.identifier2-s2.0-34147118230.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3918918
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this retrospective study was to associate the amount of keratinized gingiva present in adolescents prior to orthodontic treatment to the development of gingival recessions after the end of treatment. The sample consisted of the intra-oral photographs and orthodontic study models from 209 Caucasian patients with a mean age of 11.20 ± 1.83 years on their initial records and 14.7 ± 1.8 years on their final records. Patients were either Angle Class I or II and were submitted to non-extraction orthodontic treatment. Gingival recession was evaluated by visual inspection of the lower incisors and canines as seen in the initial and final study models and intra-oral photographs. The amount of recession was quantified using a digital caliper and the observed post-treatment gingival margin alterations were classified as unaltered, coronal migration of the gingival margin or apical migration of the gingival margin. The width of the keratinized gingiva was measured from the mucogingival line to the gingival margin on the pre-treatment photographs. The teeth that developed gingival recession and those that did not have their gingival margin position changed did not differ in relation to the initial amount of keratinized gingiva (3.00 ± 0.61 and 3.5 ± 0.86 mm, respectively). Paradoxically, teeth that presented a coronal migration of the gingival margin had a smaller initial amount of keratinized gingiva (2.26 ± 0.31 mm). The mean amount of initial keratinized gingiva did not predispose lower incisors and canines to gingival recession.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationBrazilian Oral Research
dc.relation1.223
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectGingiva
dc.subjectGingival recession
dc.subjectOrthodontics
dc.subjectkeratin
dc.subjectadolescent
dc.subjectanalysis of variance
dc.subjectcanine tooth
dc.subjectchild
dc.subjectclassification
dc.subjectdental care
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectgingiva
dc.subjectgingiva disease
dc.subjecthistology
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectincisor
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmalocclusion
dc.subjectmedical photography
dc.subjectmedical record
dc.subjectperiodontal disease
dc.subjectretrospective study
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectAnalysis of Variance
dc.subjectChild
dc.subjectCuspid
dc.subjectDental Models
dc.subjectDental Records
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectGingival Recession
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectIncisor
dc.subjectKeratins
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMalocclusion
dc.subjectPhotography, Dental
dc.subjectRetrospective Studies
dc.subjectTooth Movement
dc.titleGingival margin alterations and the pre-orthodontic treatment amount of keratinized gingiva
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución