dc.contributorUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorInstituto Tecnológico de Aeronáutica (ITA)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:21:52Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T18:01:31Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:21:52Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T18:01:31Z
dc.date.created2014-05-27T11:21:52Z
dc.date.issued2006-05-09
dc.identifierJournal of Adhesive Dentistry, v. 8, n. 2, p. 105-111, 2006.
dc.identifier1461-5185
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/68883
dc.identifier10.3290/j.jad.a11072
dc.identifierWOS:000236862200006
dc.identifier2-s2.0-33646241305
dc.identifier9234456003563666
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3918395
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To test the bond strength between a quartz-fiber-reinforced composite post (FRC) and a resin cement. The null hypothesis was that the bond strength can be increased by using a chairside tribochemical silica-coating system. Materials and Methods: Thirty quartz-FRCs (Light-Post) were divided into 3 groups according to the post surface treatment: G1) Conditioning with 32% phosphoric acid (1 min), applying a silane coupling agent; G2) etching with 10% hydrofluoric acid (1 min), silane application; G3) chairside tribochemical silica coating method (CoJet System): air abrasion with 30-μ SiO x-modified Al2O3 particles, silane application. Thereafter, the posts were cemented into a cylinder (5 mm diameter, 15 mm height) with a resin cement (Duo-Link). After cementation, the specimens were stored in distilled water (37°C/24 h) and sectioned along the x and y axes with a diamond wheel under cooling (Lab-cut 1010) to create nontrimmed bar specimens. Each specimen was attached with cyanoacrylate to an apparatus adapted for the microtensile test. Microtensile testing was conducted on a universal testing machine (1 mm/min). The data obtained were submitted to the one-way ANOVA and Tukey test (α = 0.05). Results: A significant influence of the conditioning methods was observed (p < 0.0001). The bond strength of G3 (15.14 ± 3.3) was significantly higher than the bond strengths of G1 (6.9 ± 2.3) and G2 (12.60 ± 2.8) (p = 0.000106 and p = 0.002631, respectively). Notwithstanding the groups, all the tested specimens showed adhesive failure between the resin cement and FRC. Conclusion: The chairside tribochemical system yielded the highest bond strength between resin cement and quartz-fiber post. The null hypothesis was accepted (p < 0.0001).
dc.languageeng
dc.relationJournal of Adhesive Dentistry
dc.relation1.691
dc.relation0,839
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectBond strength
dc.subjectFiber post
dc.subjectMicrotensile test
dc.subjectSurface conditioning
dc.subjectTribochemical silica coating
dc.subjectaluminum oxide
dc.subjectDuo Link
dc.subjectDuo-Link
dc.subjecthydrofluoric acid
dc.subjectmethacrylic acid derivative
dc.subjectmethacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane
dc.subjectphosphoric acid
dc.subjectresin
dc.subjectresin cement
dc.subjectsilane derivative
dc.subjectsilicon dioxide
dc.subjectchemistry
dc.subjectdental acid etching
dc.subjectdental bonding
dc.subjectdental care
dc.subjectdental surgery
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectinstrumentation
dc.subjectmaterials testing
dc.subjectmechanical stress
dc.subjectmethodology
dc.subjectsurface property
dc.subjecttensile strength
dc.subjecttooth crown
dc.subjectAcid Etching, Dental
dc.subjectAir Abrasion, Dental
dc.subjectAluminum Oxide
dc.subjectComposite Resins
dc.subjectDental Bonding
dc.subjectDental Stress Analysis
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectHydrofluoric Acid
dc.subjectMaterials Testing
dc.subjectMethacrylates
dc.subjectPhosphoric Acids
dc.subjectPost and Core Technique
dc.subjectQuartz
dc.subjectResin Cements
dc.subjectSilanes
dc.subjectSilicon Dioxide
dc.subjectStress, Mechanical
dc.subjectSurface Properties
dc.subjectTensile Strength
dc.titleMicrotensile bond strength between a quartz fiber post and a resin cement: Effect of post surface conditioning
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución