dc.contributorUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:21:50Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T18:00:55Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:21:50Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T18:00:55Z
dc.date.created2014-05-27T11:21:50Z
dc.date.issued2006-03-02
dc.identifierAngle Orthodontist, v. 76, n. 2, p. 198-203, 2006.
dc.identifier0003-3219
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/68808
dc.identifierWOS:000235872000002
dc.identifier2-s2.0-33644638795
dc.identifierWOS000235872000002.pdf
dc.identifier6493049604923160
dc.identifier6562540057111580
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3918323
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to measure and verify the esthetic influence of the bilateral spaces between maxillary teeth and lip corners, called negative space (NS), during smile. The sample was comprised of 60 smile photographs obtained from 60 individuals (30 men and 30 women) aged 18 to 25 years old. Two orthodontists and two lay people evaluated these pictures regarding esthetics by a visual analogue scale. In each picture, the right and left NS were measured in millimeters and in proportion to the smile width (SW). Data were analyzed for statistical significance (P = .05). The mean NS of the sample was 6.68 ± 1.99 mm, and the NS proportion in relation to the SW was 9.6 ± 2.56%, for both sides of the arch. No significant asymmetries were observed between the right and left sides. The NS was significantly larger in men than in women when measured in millimeters (P = .028) (7.08 ± 2.24 mm in men vs 6.28 ± 1.62 mm in women), but the NS proportion to the SW was similar (9.94 ± 2.24% in men vs 9.26 ± 1.61% in women). When the 12 individuals with the smallest NS in proportion to SW were compared with the 12 individuals with the largest NS in proportion to SW, there was no statistical difference regarding the esthetic evaluation (P = .11). It was concluded that the NS did not influence the esthetic evaluation of smile photographs in the sample in this study, for both orthodontists and lay people. © 2006 by The EH Angle Education and Research Foundation, Inc.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationAngle Orthodontist
dc.relation1.592
dc.relation1,267
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectEsthetic
dc.subjectNegative space
dc.subjectSmile
dc.subjectadolescent
dc.subjectadult
dc.subjectcephalometry
dc.subjectcheek
dc.subjectdental care
dc.subjectfacial expression
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjecthistology
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectlip
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmedical photography
dc.subjectsex difference
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectCephalometry
dc.subjectCheek
dc.subjectEsthetics, Dental
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectLip
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectPhotography, Dental
dc.subjectSex Factors
dc.subjectSmiling
dc.titleEsthetic influence of negative space in the buccal corridor during smiling
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución