dc.contributorGuarulhos University
dc.contributorUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:20:54Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T17:50:27Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:20:54Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T17:50:27Z
dc.date.created2014-05-27T11:20:54Z
dc.date.issued2003-09-29
dc.identifierInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, v. 18, n. 3, p. 383-390, 2003.
dc.identifier0882-2786
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/67417
dc.identifierWOS:000183428600008
dc.identifier2-s2.0-0041418178
dc.identifier6100859465871929
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3917065
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The goal of this study was to evaluate microbiota and radiographic peri-implant bone loss associated with ligature-induced peri-implantitis. Materials and Methods: Thirty-six dental implants with 4 different surfaces (9 commercially pure titanium, 9 titanium plasma-sprayed, 9 hydroxyapatite, and 9 acid-etched) were placed in the edentulous mandibles of 6 dogs. After 3 months with optimal plaque control, abutment connection was performed. On days 0, 20, 40, and 60 after placement of cotton ligatures, both microbiologic samples and periapical radiographs were obtained. The presence of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia/nigrescens, Campylobacter spp, Capnocytophaga spp, Fusobacterium spp, beta-hemolytic Streptococcus, and Candida spp were evaluated culturally. Results: P intermedia/nigrescens was detected in 13.89% of implants at baseline and 100% of implants at other periods. P gingivalis was not detected at baseline, but after 20 and 40 days it was detected in 33.34% of implants and at 60 days it was detected in 29.03% of dental implants. Fusobacterium spp was detected in all periods. Streptococci were detected in 16.67% of implants at baseline and in 83.34%, 72.22%, and 77.42% of implants at 20, 40, and 60 days, respectively. Campylobacter spp and Candida spp were detected in low proportions. The total viable count analysis showed no significant differences among surfaces (P = .831), although a significant difference was observed after ligature placement (P < .0014). However, there was no significant qualitative difference, in spite of the difference among the periods. The peri-implant bone loss was not significantly different between all the dental implant surfaces (P = .908). Discussion and Conclusions: These data suggest that with ligature-induced peri-implantitis, both time and periodontal pathogens affect all surfaces equally after 60 days.
dc.languageeng
dc.relationInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants
dc.relation1.699
dc.relation1,576
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectAnimal study
dc.subjectDental implants
dc.subjectPeri-implantitis
dc.subjectPeriodontal diseases
dc.subjectSurface characteristics
dc.subjecthydroxyapatite
dc.subjecttitanium
dc.subjectActinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans
dc.subjectanimal experiment
dc.subjectanimal model
dc.subjectbeta hemolytic Streptococcus
dc.subjectbone radiography
dc.subjectCampylobacter
dc.subjectCandida
dc.subjectCapnocytophaga
dc.subjectcementation
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectdog
dc.subjectedentulousness
dc.subjectFusobacterium
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmetal implantation
dc.subjectmicrobiological examination
dc.subjectmicrobiological parameters
dc.subjectmicroorganism detection
dc.subjectnonhuman
dc.subjectosteolysis
dc.subjectPorphyromonas gingivalis
dc.subjectPrevotella intermedia
dc.subjectPrevotella nigrescens
dc.subjectprosthesis infection
dc.subjectquantitative analysis
dc.subjectstatistical significance
dc.subjectsurface property
dc.subjecttooth implantation
dc.subjecttreatment outcome
dc.titleMicrobiologic and radiographic analysis of ligature-induced peri-implantitis with different dental implant surfaces
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución