dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-27T11:17:55Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T17:29:02Z
dc.date.available2014-05-27T11:17:55Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T17:29:02Z
dc.date.created2014-05-27T11:17:55Z
dc.date.issued1994-01-01
dc.identifierRevista Brasileira de Anestesiologia, v. 44, n. 3, p. 163-170, 1994.
dc.identifier0034-7094
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/64450
dc.identifier2-s2.0-0028355925
dc.identifier2-s2.0-0028355925.pdf
dc.identifier7802830125342070
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3914503
dc.description.abstractLittle research has been done with propofol in relation to renal function. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of the continuous infusion of propofol on renal function in dogs. Sixteen dogs, previously anesthetized with pentobarbital sodium (30 mg.kg-1) for surgical preparation, catheterism and monitoring, were studied. The dogs were mechanically ventilated with air and received alcuronium (0.2 mg.kg-1 in bolus and 0.06 mg.kg-1 - maintenance). The following parameters were studied: heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), central venous pressure (CVP), aortic blood flow (A(o)BF - by electromagnetic flowmeter installed in the ascending aortic), aortic vascular resistance index (A(o)VRI), renal plasma flow (ERPF - by para-aminohipurate clearance), glomerular filtration rate (GFR - by creatinine clearance), effective renal blood flow (ERBF = ERPF/1 - hematocrit), urinary volume (UV), renal vascular resistance (RVR = MAP.80/ERBF.10-3), urinary sodium excretion (UE(Na)), fractionated sodium excretion (FE(Na)), osmolar clearance (C(osm)) and free water clearance (C(H2O)). These parameters were studied at 15 (M1), 30 (M2), 45 (M3) and 60 (M4) min after beginning pentobarbital sodium infusion (5 mg.kg-1.h-1). The dogs were allocated into two groups of eight animals each: G1 (control-pentobarbital sodium) and G2 (propofol). In G1, pentobarbital was given at the four times studied. G2 dogs received the same treatment as G1 dogs at M1 and M2; infusion of pentobarbital was substituted by propofol (3 mg.kg-1 bolus, followed by 12 mg.kg-1.h-1 continuous infusion) at M3 and M4. Profile Analysis was used to analyze the results statistically. In G1 (pentobarbital), there was a significant increase in RVR (M1 < M4) and a decrease in ERPF and ERBF (M1 > M4). In G2 (propofol) there was only a significant increase in A(o)BF (M1 < M2 = M3). In comparison among groups, these was a significant alteration of FE(Na) at M3 (pentobarbital > propofol). It was observed that the continuous infusion of propofol in dogs, at the given doses, did not alter the basic variables of renal function and hemodynamics studied. We concluded that propofol can be one of the drugs of choice to provide base anesthesia in studies of renal function in dogs.
dc.languagepor
dc.relationRevista Brasileira de Anestesiologia
dc.relation0.850
dc.relation0,320
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceScopus
dc.subjectanesthetic technique, general: continuous infusion, venous
dc.subjectanesthetic, venous: propofol, pentobarbital sodium
dc.subjectkidney: clearance, function
dc.subjectmonitoring: hemodynamic
dc.subjectalcuronium
dc.subjectpentobarbital
dc.subjectpropofol
dc.subjectanimal experiment
dc.subjectblood flow
dc.subjectblood pressure
dc.subjectcontrolled study
dc.subjectdog
dc.subjectglomerulus filtration rate
dc.subjectheart rate
dc.subjecthemodynamics
dc.subjectintravenous drug administration
dc.subjectkidney function
dc.subjectnonhuman
dc.subjectsodium excretion
dc.subjecturine volume
dc.titleEFEITOS DA INFUSAO CONTINUA DO PROPOFOL SOBRE A FUNCAO RENAL DO CAO. ESTUDO COMPARATIVO COM O PENTOBARBITAL SODICO
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución