dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T15:32:54Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T17:12:38Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T15:32:54Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T17:12:38Z
dc.date.created2014-05-20T15:32:54Z
dc.date.issued2012-03-01
dc.identifierQuintessence International. Hanover Park: Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, v. 43, n. 3, p. 255-262, 2012.
dc.identifier0033-6572
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/41685
dc.identifierWOS:000317577000012
dc.identifier2-s2.0-84864013938
dc.identifier5691730284259344
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3912577
dc.description.abstractObjective: To verify a potential association between the presence of noncarious cervical lesions, parafunctional habits, and temporomandibular disorder (TMD) diagnosis. Method and Materials: Sample-size calculation provided a value of 130 participants with a confidence level of 95% and an error margin of 5%. A population of 132 volunteers (30 men: mean age, 23.7 +/- 3.05 years; 102 women: mean age, 24.9 +/- 5.86 years) underwent an oral examination and was interviewed by a trained dentist. The following parameters were registered: personal details, TMD diagnosis, parafunctional habits, and noncarious cervical lesion presence. The population was then divided into a noncarious cervical lesion group and a control group and subjected to the t test, chi-square test, Fisher exact test, and Spearman correlation (alpha = .05). Results: Noncarious cervical lesions were present in 39% of the population, with the largest concentrations found in the maxillary premolars (32%). The data showed a significant association between noncarious cervical lesion presence, tooth clenching (P = .03), and nail biting (P = .02), as well as a relation with TMD diagnosis (Fonseca Index [P = .01] and Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD (RDC/TMD) [P = .004] ). In the noncarious cervical lesion group, direct rank correlation was found between maxillary premolars and clenching (P = .03), mandibular canines and nail biting (P = .05), and mandibular incisors and parafunctional habits without dental contacts (P = .02). Conclusion: Parafunctional habits and TMD presence should be taken into account in the diagnosis and treatment plan of noncarious cervical lesions.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherQuintessence Publishing Co Inc
dc.relationQuintessence International
dc.relation1.088
dc.relation0,563
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectbruxism
dc.subjectfacial pain
dc.subjectnoncarious cervical lesions
dc.subjecttooth attrition
dc.subjecttraumatic dental occlusion
dc.titleClinical evaluation of the association of noncarious cervical lesions, parafunctional habits, and TMD diagnosis
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución