dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T15:32:40Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T17:11:30Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T15:32:40Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T17:11:30Z
dc.date.created2014-05-20T15:32:40Z
dc.date.issued2009-01-01
dc.identifierArquivos do Instituto Biologico São Paulo. , v. 76, n. 4, p. 701-705, 2009.
dc.identifier0020-3653
dc.identifier1808-1657
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/41516
dc.identifierZOOREC:ZOOR14606040243
dc.identifierZOORECZOOR14606040243.pdf
dc.identifier2685769620605055
dc.identifier0299583248667294
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3912423
dc.description.abstractThe diagnosis of rabies in bats is usually performed using the brain of suspected animals. The main hypothesis tested by the present study was whether the aspiration method using a plastic pipette (Pasteur type) was effective in the collection of bat brain sample for rabies diagnosis when compared to the skull-opening method. A total of 200 bats of 4 species were studied: Molossus rufus E. Geoffroy, 1805, Molossus molossus (Pallas, 1766), Artibeus lituratus (Olfers, 1818) and Myotis nigricans (Schinz, 1821). The proportion of brain weight compared to body weight was statistically higher when using the traditional method, although the brain mass collected by the aspiration method was enough for rabies diagnosis and did not damage any skull biometric characteristics. The results demonstrate that both collection methods detected positive samples, while the aspiration method has the advantage of skull preservation, permitting the identification of the species.
dc.languagepor
dc.relationArquivos do Instituto Biologico São Paulo
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.titleEvaluation of aspiration method for bat brain collection for rabies diagnosis.
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución