dc.contributorWHO
dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorGriffith Univ
dc.contributorBeijing Hui Long Guan Hosp
dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
dc.contributorAdyar Hosp
dc.contributorSNEHA
dc.contributorUniv Colombo
dc.contributorUniv KwaZulu Natal
dc.contributorHanoi Med Univ
dc.contributorEstonian Ctr Behav & Hlth Sci
dc.contributorTehran Psychiat Inst
dc.contributorKarolinska Inst
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T15:32:37Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T17:11:12Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T15:32:37Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T17:11:12Z
dc.date.created2014-05-20T15:32:37Z
dc.date.issued2010-01-01
dc.identifierCrisis-the Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention. Gottingen: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers, v. 31, n. 4, p. 194-201, 2010.
dc.identifier0227-5910
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/41473
dc.identifier10.1027/0227-5910/a000052
dc.identifierWOS:000281362600004
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3912385
dc.description.abstractBackground: Attempted suicide is a strong risk factor for subsequent suicidal behaviors. Innovative strategies to deal with people who have attempted suicide are needed, particularly in resource-poor settings. Aims: To evaluate a brief educational intervention and periodic follow-up contacts (BIC) for suicide attempters in five culturally different sites (Campinas, Brazil; Chennai, India; Colombo, Sri Lanka; Karaj, Islamic Republic of Iran; and Yuncheng, People's Republic of China) as part of the WHO Multisite Intervention Study on Suicidal Behaviors (SUPRE-MISS). Methods: Among the 1,867 suicide attempters enrolled in the emergency departments of the participating sites, 922 (49.4%) were randomly assigned to a brief intervention and contact (BIC) group and 945 (50.6%) to a treatment as usual (TAU) group. Repeated suicide attempts over the 18 months following the index attempt - the secondary outcome measure presented in this paper - were identified by follow-up calls or visits. Subsequent completed suicide - the primary outcome measure has been reported in a previous paper. Results: Overall, the proportion of subjects with repeated suicide attempts was similar in the BIC and TAU groups (7.6% vs. 7.5%, chi(2) = 0.013; p = .909), but there were differences in rates across the five sites. Conclusions: This study from five low-and middle-income countries does not confirm the effectiveness of brief educational intervention and follow-up contacts for suicide attempters in reducing subsequent repetition of suicide attempts up to 18 months after discharge from emergency departments.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherHogrefe & Huber Publishers
dc.relationCrisis-the Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention
dc.relation1.583
dc.relation0,699
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectsuicide
dc.subjectrepeated suicide attempts
dc.subjectbrief intervention
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trial
dc.subjectlow- and middle-income countries
dc.titleRepetition of Suicide Attempts Data from Emergency Care Settings in Five Culturally Different Low- and Middle-Income Countries Participating in the WHO SUPRE-MISS Study
dc.typeTrabalho apresentado em evento


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución