dc.contributor | Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) | |
dc.contributor | Universidade de São Paulo (USP) | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-05-20T15:27:05Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-05T16:41:07Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-05-20T15:27:05Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-10-05T16:41:07Z | |
dc.date.created | 2014-05-20T15:27:05Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2003-08-01 | |
dc.identifier | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Philadelphia: W B Saunders Co, v. 84, n. 8, p. 1217-1223, 2003. | |
dc.identifier | 0003-9993 | |
dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/37128 | |
dc.identifier | 10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00147-3 | |
dc.identifier | WOS:000184627000019 | |
dc.identifier | 1652339643129712 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3908704 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: To assess sensory deficits and their effects on proprioceptive and motor function in patients who had undergone unilateral anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.Design: Four evaluations were conducted: (1) joint position perception of the knee for predetermined angles (0degrees, 15degrees, 30degrees, 45degrees, 60degrees); (2) threshold for detection of passive knee motion at 0degrees, 15degrees, 30degrees, 45degrees, and 60degrees moving into flexion and at 15degrees, 30degrees, 45degrees, and 60degrees moving into extension; (3) latency onset of hamstring muscles; and (4) postural control during upright double- and single-leg stance.Setting: Movement laboratory in Brazil.Participants: Ten participants who had surgical reconstruction of the ACL (reconstructed group) and 10 participants without knee injury (control group).Interventions: Not applicable.Main Outcome Measures: Absolute error, angular displacement, hamstring muscles latency, and mean sway amplitude.Results: Individuals with a reconstructed knee showed decreased joint position perception, a higher threshold for detection of passive knee motion, longer latency of hamstring muscles, and decreased performance in postural control.Conclusions: After lesion and ACL reconstruction, sensory and motor behavior changes were still observed. This may be because of the lack of proprioceptive information resulting from the ACL lesion and/or substitution of ACL by the graft. (C) 2003 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | W B Saunders Co | |
dc.relation | Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation | |
dc.relation | 3.077 | |
dc.relation | 1,501 | |
dc.rights | Acesso restrito | |
dc.source | Web of Science | |
dc.subject | anterior cruciate ligament | |
dc.subject | posture | |
dc.subject | proprioception | |
dc.subject | rehabilitation | |
dc.subject | response latency | |
dc.title | Proprioceptive and behavior impairments in individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knees | |
dc.type | Artigo | |