dc.contributorUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T14:05:27Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T14:57:36Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T14:05:27Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T14:57:36Z
dc.date.created2014-05-20T14:05:27Z
dc.date.issued2011-03-01
dc.identifierJournal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. Birmingham: Journal Pedodontics Inc, v. 35, n. 3, p. 301-304, 2011.
dc.identifier1053-4628
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/22968
dc.identifierWOS:000290593300011
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3896493
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to evaluate the micro-shear bond strength of 5 adhesive systems to enamel, one single-bottle acid-etch adhesive (O), two self-etching primers (P) and two all-in-one self-etching adhesives (S). Method: Sixty premolar enamel surfaces (buccal or lingual) were ground flat with 400- and 600-grit SiC papers and randomly divided into 5 groups (n=12), according to the adhesive system.. SB2 - Single Bond 2 (O); CSE - Clearfil SE Bond (P); ADS - AdheSE (P); PLP - Adper Prompt L-Pop (S); XE3 - Xeno III (S). Tygon tubing (inner diameter of 0.8mm) restricted the bonding area to obtain the resin composite (Z250) cylinders. After storage in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 24h and thermocycling, micro-shear testing was performed (crosshead speed of 0.5mm/min). Data were submitted to one-way ANOVA and Tukey test (a=5%). Samples were also subjected to stereomicroscopic and SEM evaluations after micro-shear testing. Mean bond strength values (MPa +/- SD) and the results of Tukey test were: SB2: 36.36(+/- 3.34)a; ADS: 33.03(+/- 7.83)a; XE3: 32.76(+/- 5.61)a; CSE: 30.61(+/- 6.68)a; PLP: 22.17(+/- 6.05)b. Groups with the same letter were not statistically different. It can be concluded that no significant difference was there between SB2, ADS, XE3 and CSE, in spite of different etching patterns of these adhesives. Only PLP presented statistically lower bond strengths compared with others. J Clin Pediatr Dent 35(3): 301-304, 2011
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherJournal Pedodontics Inc
dc.relationJournal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry
dc.relation0.854
dc.relation0,469
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.titleMicro-Shear Bond Strength of Different Adhesives to Human Dental Enamel
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución