dc.contributorUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
dc.contributorUniversidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB)
dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T14:05:04Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T14:56:49Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T14:05:04Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T14:56:49Z
dc.date.created2014-05-20T14:05:04Z
dc.date.issued2011-04-01
dc.identifierJournal of Adhesive Dentistry. Hanover Park: Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, v. 13, n. 2, p. 155-162, 2011.
dc.identifier1461-5185
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/22823
dc.identifier10.3290/j.jad.a18784
dc.identifierWOS:000289754300008
dc.identifier9234456003563666
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3896392
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of thermocycling (TC), self-adhesive resin cements and surface conditioning on the microtensile bond strength (mu TBS) between feldspathic ceramic blocks and resin cements.Materials and Methods: Fifty-six feldspathic ceramic blocks (10 x 7 x 5 mm) (Vita Mark II) were divided into groups according to the factors "resin cement" (3 cements) and "surface conditioning" (no conditioning or conditioning [10% hydrofluoric acid etching for 5 min + silanization]) (n = 8): group 1: conditioning+Variolink II (control group); group 2: no conditioning+Biscem; group 3: no conditioning+RelyX U100; group 4: no conditioning+Maxcem Elite; group 5: conditioning+Biscem; group 6: conditioning+RelyX U100; group 7: conditioning+Maxcem Elite. The ceramic-cement blocks were sectioned to produce non-trimmed bar specimens (adhered cross-sectional area: 1 +/- 0.1 mm(2)), which were divided into two storage conditions: dry, mu TBS immediately after cutting; TC (12,000x, 5 degrees C/55 degrees C). Statistical significance was deterimined using two-way ANOVA (7 strategies and 2 storage conditions) and the post-hoc Tukey test (p<0.05).Results: Resin cement and thermocycling affected the mu TBS significantly (p = 0.001). In the dry condition, group 5 (18 +/- 6.5 MPa) presented the lowest values of mu TBS when compared to the other groups. TC decreased the mean mu TBS values significantly (p<0.05) for all resin cements tested (9.7 +/- 2.3 to 22.1 +/- 6.3 MPa), except for the resin cement RelyX U100 (22.1 +/- 6.3 MPa). In groups 3 and 4, it was not possible to measure mu TBS, since these groups had 100% pre-test failures during sectioning. Moreover, the same occurred in group 2 after TC, where 100% failure was observed during thermocycling (spontaneous failures).Conclusion: Hydrofluoric acid etching and silanization of the feldspathic ceramic surface are essential for bonding self-adhesive resin cement to a feldspathic ceramic, regardless of the resin cement used. Non-etched ceramic is not recommended.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherQuintessence Publishing Co Inc
dc.relationJournal of Adhesive Dentistry
dc.relation1.691
dc.relation0,839
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectbond strength
dc.subjectfeldspathic ceramic
dc.subjectresin cements
dc.subjectceramic surface treatment
dc.subjectthermocycling
dc.titleDurability of Microtensile Bond to Nonetched and Etched Feldspar Ceramic: Self-adhesive Resin Cements vs Conventional Resin
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución