dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T14:05:04Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T14:56:47Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T14:05:04Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T14:56:47Z
dc.date.created2014-05-20T14:05:04Z
dc.date.issued2008-02-01
dc.identifierJournal of Adhesive Dentistry. Hanover Park: Quintessence Publishing Co Inc, v. 10, n. 2, p. 127-133, 2008.
dc.identifier1461-5185
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/22820
dc.identifier10.3290/j.jad.a13331
dc.identifierWOS:000255033200007
dc.identifier6087378734666740
dc.identifier9234456003563666
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3896389
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study evaluated the bond strength of two etch-and-rinse adhesive systems (two- and three-step) and a self-etching system to Coronal and root canal dentin.Materials and Methods: The root canals of 30 human incisors and canines were instrumented and prepared with burs. The posts used for luting were duplicated with dual resin cement (Duo-link) inside Aestheti Plus #2 molds. Thus, three groups were formed (n = 10) according to the adhesive system employed: All-Bond 2 (TE3) + resin cement post (rcp) + Duo-link (DI); One-Step Plus (TE2) + rcp + DI; Tyrian/One-Step Plus (SE) + rcp + DI. Afterwards, 8 transverse sections (1.5 mm) were cut from 4 mm above the CEJ up to 4 mm short of the root canal apex, comprising coronal and root canal dentin. The sections were submitted to push-out testing in a universal testing machine EMIC (1 mm/min). Bond strength data were analyzed with two-way repeated measures ANOVA and Tukey's test (p < 0.05).Results: The relationship between the adhesives was not the same in the different regions (p < 0.05). Comparison of the means achieved with the adhesives in each region (Tukey; p < 0.05) revealed that TE3 (mean standard deviation: 5.22 +/- 1.70) was higher than TE2 (2.60 +/- 1.74) and SE (1.68 +/- 1.85).Conclusion: Under the experimental conditions, better bonding to dentin was achieved using the three-step etch-and-rinse system, especially in the coronal region. Therefore, the traditional etch-and-rinse three-step adhesive system seems to be the best choice for teeth needing adhesive endodontic restorations.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherQuintessence Publishing Co Inc
dc.relationJournal of Adhesive Dentistry
dc.relation1.691
dc.relation0,839
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectbond strength
dc.subjectpush-out test
dc.subjectcoronal dentin
dc.subjectroot canal dentin
dc.subjectdental adhesives
dc.titleEffect of adhesive system type and tooth region on the bond strength to dentin
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución