dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorUniversidade do Vale do Paraíba (UNIVAP)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T14:04:47Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T14:56:08Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T14:04:47Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T14:56:08Z
dc.date.created2014-05-20T14:04:47Z
dc.date.issued2011-11-01
dc.identifierArchives of Oral Biology. Oxford: Pergamon-Elsevier B.V. Ltd, v. 56, n. 11, p. 1299-1305, 2011.
dc.identifier0003-9969
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/22717
dc.identifier10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.05.013
dc.identifierWOS:000297033700014
dc.identifierWOS000297033700014.pdf
dc.identifier0322020541055900
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3896311
dc.description.abstractThe effect of erythrosine- and LED-mediated photodynamic therapy (PDT) on planktonic cultures and biofilms of Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis was evaluated. Planktonic cultures of standardized suspensions (10(6) cells/mL) of C. albicans and C. dubliniensis were treated with erythrosine concentrations of 0.39-200 mu M and LEDs in a 96-well microtiter plate. Biofilms formed by C. albicans and C. dubliniensis in the bottom of a 96-well microtiter plate were treated with 400 mu M erythrosine and LEDs. After PDT, the biofilms were analysed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The antimicrobial effect of PDT against planktonic cultures and biofilms was verified by counting colony-forming units (CFU/mL), and the data were submitted to analysis of variance and the Tukey test (P < 0.05). C. albicans and C. dubliniensis were not detectable after PDT of planktonic cultures with erythrosine concentrations of 3.12 mu M or higher. The CFU/mL values obtained from biofilms were reduced 0.74 log(10) for C. albicans and 0.21 log(10) for C. dubliniensis. SEM revealed a decrease in the quantity of yeasts and hyphae in the biofilm after PDT. In conclusion, C. albicans and C. dubliniensis were susceptible to erythrosine- and LED-mediated PDT, but the biofilms of both Candida species were more resistant than their planktonic counterparts. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherPergamon-Elsevier B.V. Ltd
dc.relationArchives of Oral Biology
dc.relation2.050
dc.relation0,752
dc.rightsAcesso aberto
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectCandida albicans
dc.subjectCandida dubliniensis
dc.subjectPhotodynamic therapy
dc.subjectErythrosine
dc.subjectLight-emitting diode
dc.titleSusceptibility of Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis to erythrosine- and LED-mediated photodynamic therapy
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución