dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:59:57Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T14:44:31Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:59:57Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T14:44:31Z
dc.date.created2014-05-20T13:59:57Z
dc.date.issued2010-07-10
dc.identifierEstuarine Coastal and Shelf Science. London: Academic Press Ltd- Elsevier B.V. Ltd, v. 88, n. 3, p. 322-328, 2010.
dc.identifier0272-7714
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/21198
dc.identifier10.1016/j.ecss.2010.04.009
dc.identifierWOS:000279537500003
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3895019
dc.description.abstractContamination by butyltin compounds (BTs) has been reported in estuarine environments worldwide, with serious impacts on the biota of these areas. Considering that BTs can be degraded by varying environmental conditions such as incident light and salinity, the short-term variations in such factors may lead to inaccurate estimates of BTs concentrations in nature. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the possibility that measurements of BTs in estuarine sediments are influenced by different sampling conditions, including period of the day (day or night), tidal zone (intertidal or subtidal), and tides (high or low). The study area is located on the Brazilian southeastern coast, Sao Vicente Estuary, at Pescadores Beach, where BT contamination was previously detected. Three replicate samples of surface sediment were collected randomly in each combination of period of the day, tidal zone, and tide condition, from three subareas along the beach, totaling 72 samples. BTs were analyzed by GC-PFPD using a tin filter and a VF-5 column, by means of a validated method. The concentrations of tributyltin (TBT), dibutyltin (DBT), and monobutyltin (MBT) ranged from undetectable to 161 ng Sn g(-1) (d.w.). In most samples (71%), only MBT was quantifiable, whereas TBTs were measured in only 14, suggesting either an old contamination or rapid degradation processes. DBT was found in 27 samples, but could be quantified in only one. MBT concentrations did not differ significantly with time of day, zones, or tide conditions. DBT and TBT could not be compared under all these environmental conditions, because only a few samples were above the quantification limit. Pooled samples of TBT did not reveal any difference between day and night. These results indicated that, in assessing contamination by butyltin compounds, surface-sediment samples can be collected in any environmental conditions. However, the wide variation of BTs concentrations in the study area, i.e., over a very small geographic scale, illustrates the need for representative hierarchical and composite sampling designs that are compatible with the multiscalar temporal and spatial variability common to most marine systems. The use of such sampling designs will be necessary for future attempts to quantitatively evaluate and monitor the occurrence and impact of these compounds in nature. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherAcademic Press Ltd Elsevier B.V. Ltd
dc.relationEstuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science
dc.relation2.413
dc.relation1,059
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectorganotin
dc.subjectEstuarine chemistry
dc.subjectOrganic compounds
dc.subjectsediments
dc.subjectpollution monitoring
dc.titleOccurrence and behavior of butyltins in intertidal and shallow subtidal surface sediments of an estuarine beach under different sampling conditions
dc.typeResumo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución