dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorUniv Reading
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:47:46Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T14:17:21Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:47:46Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T14:17:21Z
dc.date.created2014-05-20T13:47:46Z
dc.date.issued1998-10-01
dc.identifierJournal of Quality Technology. Milwaukee: Amer Soc Quality Control-asqc, v. 30, n. 4, p. 314-327, 1998.
dc.identifier0022-4065
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/17023
dc.identifierWOS:000076695500002
dc.identifier3720489366427955
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3891853
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we extend the use of the variance dispersion graph (VDG) to experiments in which the response surface (RS) design must be blocked. Through several examples we evaluate the prediction performances of RS designs in non-orthogonal block designs compared with the equivalent unblocked designs and orthogonally blocked designs. These examples illustrate that good prediction performance of designs in small blocks can be expected in practice. Most importantly, we show that the allocation of the treatment set to blocks can seriously affect the prediction properties of designs; thus, much care is needed in performing this allocation.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherAmer Soc Quality Control-asqc
dc.relationJournal of Quality Technology
dc.relation2.306
dc.relation1,814
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectblocking
dc.subjectBox-Behnken designs
dc.subjectcentral composite designs
dc.subjectD-optimality
dc.subjectprediction
dc.titleVariance dispersion graphs for comparing blocked response surface designs
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución