dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:47:44Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T14:17:18Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:47:44Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T14:17:18Z
dc.date.created2014-05-20T13:47:44Z
dc.date.issued2002-01-01
dc.identifierCommunications In Statistics-theory and Methods. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc., v. 31, n. 7, p. 1215-1229, 2002.
dc.identifier0361-0926
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/17007
dc.identifier10.1081/STA-120004920
dc.identifierWOS:000177082800013
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3891846
dc.description.abstractTies among event times are often recorded in survival studies. For example, in a two week laboratory study where event times are measured in days, ties are very likely to occur. The proportional hazards model might be used in this setting using an approximated partial likelihood function. This approximation works well when the number of ties is small. on the other hand, discrete regression models are suggested when the data are heavily tied. However, in many situations it is not clear which approach should be used in practice. In this work, empirical guidelines based on Monte Carlo simulations are provided. These recommendations are based on a measure of the amount of tied data present and the mean square error. An example illustrates the proposed criterion.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherMarcel Dekker Inc
dc.relationCommunications in Statistics: Theory and Methods
dc.relation0.353
dc.relation0,352
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectBreslow approximation
dc.subjectCox model
dc.subjectMonte Carlo simulations
dc.subjectproportional hazards model
dc.subjecttied observations
dc.titleLikelihood approximations and discrete models for tied survival data
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución