dc.contributorGuarulhos Univ
dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorUniv Chieti
dc.date.accessioned2014-02-26T17:28:10Z
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:45:10Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T14:10:36Z
dc.date.available2014-02-26T17:28:10Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:45:10Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T14:10:36Z
dc.date.created2014-02-26T17:28:10Z
dc.date.created2014-05-20T13:45:10Z
dc.date.issued2007-02-01
dc.identifierJournal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B-applied Biomaterials. Hoboken: Wiley-liss, v. 80B, n. 2, p. 377-385, 2007.
dc.identifier1552-4973
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/15878
dc.identifier10.1002/jbm.b.30608
dc.identifierWOS:000243866500013
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3891014
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of the oxidized surface on bone-to-implant contact (BIC%), the bone density in the threaded area (BA %), as well as the bone density outside the threaded area (BD%) in human jaws after 2 months of unloaded healing. Thirteen subjects (mean age 42.61 +/- 6.15 years) received two microimplants (2.5 mm diameter and 6 mm length) each, during conventional mandible or maxilla implant surgery. The microimplants with commercially pure titanium surfaces (machined) and oxidized surfaces served as the control and test surfaces, respectively. After 2 months, the microimplants and the surrounding tissue were removed and prepared for histomorphometric analysis. All microimplants, except two machined and one oxidized microimplant surfaces, were found to be clinically stable after the healing period. Histometric evaluation indicated that the mean BIC % was (21.71 +/- 13.11) % and (39.04 +/- 15.75) % for machined and oxidized microimplant surfaces, respectively. The BD% was higher for the oxidized surface, although there was no difference for maxilla and mandible. The oxidized surface impacted the BA% for the type-IV bone. Data suggest that the oxidized surface presented a higher bone-to-implant contact rate compared with machined surfaces under unloaded conditions, after a healing period of 2 months. (c) 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell
dc.relationJournal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials
dc.relation3.373
dc.relation0,715
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectdental implants
dc.subjectimplant surface topography
dc.subjectosseointegration
dc.subjectwound healing
dc.subjecthuman histology
dc.titleInfluence of implant surface topography on early osseointegration: A histological study in human jaws
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución