dc.contributor | Universidade de São Paulo (USP) | |
dc.contributor | Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) | |
dc.contributor | Univ Zurich | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-09-30T18:30:27Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-05-20T13:44:10Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-05T14:07:58Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-09-30T18:30:27Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-05-20T13:44:10Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-10-05T14:07:58Z | |
dc.date.created | 2013-09-30T18:30:27Z | |
dc.date.created | 2014-05-20T13:44:10Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008-01-01 | |
dc.identifier | Caries Research. Basel: Karger, v. 42, n. 4, p. 269-274, 2008. | |
dc.identifier | 0008-4166 | |
dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/11449/15459 | |
dc.identifier | 10.1159/000135672 | |
dc.identifier | WOS:000258317800005 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3890679 | |
dc.description.abstract | This in vitro study assessed the effect of an experimental 4% TiF(4) varnish compared to commercial NaF and NaF/CaF(2) varnishes and 4% TiF(4) solution on enamel erosion. For this, 72 bovine enamel specimens were randomly allocated to the following treatments: NaF varnish (2.26% F), NaF/CaF(2) varnish (5.63% F), 4% TiF(4) varnish (2.45% F), F-free placebo varnish, 4% TiF(4) solution (2.45% F) and control (not treated). The varnishes were applied in a thin layer and removed after 6 h. The solution was applied to the enamel surface for 1 min. Then, the specimens were alternately de- and remineralized (6 times/day) in an artificial mouth for 5 days at 37 degrees C. Demineralization was performed with the beverage Sprite (1 min, 3 ml/min) and remineralization with artificial saliva (day: 59 min, 0.5 ml/min; during the night: 0.1 ml/min). The mean daily increment of erosion and the cumulative erosion data were tested using ANOVA and ANCOVA, respectively, followed by Tukey's test (alpha = 0.05). The mean daily erosion increments and cumulative erosion (micrometers) were significantly less for the TiF(4) varnish (0.30 +/- 0.11/0.65 +/- 0.75) than for the NaF varnish (0.58 +/- 0.11/1.47 +/- 1.07) or the NaF/CaF(2) varnish (0.62 +/- 0.10/1.68 +/- 1.17), which in turn showed significantly less erosion than the placebo varnish (0.78 +/- 0.12/2.05 +/- 1.43), TiF(4) solution (0.86 +/- 0.11/2.05 +/- 1.49) and control (0.77 +/- 0.16/2.06 +/- 1.49). In conclusion, the TiF(4) varnish seems to be a promising treatment to reduce enamel loss under mild erosive conditions. Copyright (C) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel. | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.publisher | Karger | |
dc.relation | Caries Research | |
dc.relation | 1.243 | |
dc.relation | 0,579 | |
dc.rights | Acesso restrito | |
dc.source | Web of Science | |
dc.subject | dental erosion | |
dc.subject | enamel | |
dc.subject | fluoride | |
dc.subject | titanium | |
dc.title | The effect of an experimental 4% TiF(4) varnish compared to NaF varnishes and 4% TiF(4) solution on dental erosion in vitro | |
dc.type | Artigo | |