Optical Impression Systems for CAD-CAM Restorations

dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-30T18:30:14Z
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:43:48Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T14:07:05Z
dc.date.available2013-09-30T18:30:14Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:43:48Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T14:07:05Z
dc.date.created2013-09-30T18:30:14Z
dc.date.created2014-05-20T13:43:48Z
dc.date.issued2012-11-01
dc.identifierJournal of Craniofacial Surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, v. 23, n. 6, p. E575-E579, 2012.
dc.identifier1049-2275
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/15313
dc.identifier10.1097/SCS.0b013e31826b8043
dc.identifierWOS:000311889300020
dc.identifier5581364193525500
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3890563
dc.description.abstractComputer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing images can be taken through either direct or indirect imaging. For the indirect systems, the digitalization is obtained from the impression material or cast, and for the direct ones the image is taken directly from the mouth using intraoral scanners.The direct acquisition systems have been constantly improved because these are less invasive, quicker, and more precise than the conventional method. Besides, the digital images can be easily stored for a long time. Therefore, the aim of this paper was to describe and discuss based on the literature the main direct image acquisition systems available on the market: CEREC Bluecam (Sirona), Lava C.O.S. System (3M ESPE), iTero System (Cadent/Straumann), and E4D System (D4D Technologies).
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins
dc.relationJournal of Craniofacial Surgery
dc.relation0.772
dc.relation0,448
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectCAD-CAM
dc.subjectdigital impressions
dc.titleOptical Impression Systems for CAD-CAM Restorations
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución