dc.contributorUniv Illinois
dc.contributorMarquette Univ
dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorNova SE Univ
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-30T18:29:52Z
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:43:36Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T14:06:24Z
dc.date.available2013-09-30T18:29:52Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:43:36Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T14:06:24Z
dc.date.created2013-09-30T18:29:52Z
dc.date.created2014-05-20T13:43:36Z
dc.date.issued2012-04-01
dc.identifierJournal of Prosthodontics-implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry. Malden: Wiley-blackwell, v. 21, n. 3, p. 225-231, 2012.
dc.identifier1059-941X
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/15220
dc.identifier10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00792.x
dc.identifierWOS:000302625700016
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3890480
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The purposes of this study were to describe the demographics of abstracts presented at the prosthodontics section of IADR General Sessions from 2004 to 2005, evaluate the publication rate of abstracts, and analyze the relationship between variables in abstracts and publication.Materials and Methods: Prosthodontics research section abstracts from the IADR General Session in 2004 and 2005 were evaluated for: number of authors, presentation type, origin, affiliation, topic, study design, statistics, study outcome, and funding. The publication rate was calculated following a PubMed search. The journal of publication, year of publication, and the length of time before publication were analyzed. Descriptive statistics were used for the data analysis; the relationships between presentation type, study design, study outcome, statistics, funding, and publication were analyzed using logistic regression (alpha = 0.05).Results: From 346 abstracts, 37.0% were published. For oral presentations, 40.7% were published; 35.8% of poster presentations were published. The mean duration before publicationwas 26.4months. North America had themost abstracts, and Europe had the most publications. Fixed prosthodontic research had the highest number and proportion for publication. A significant association with publication was noted for neutral study outcomes (p = 0.018), studies with funding (p = 0.035), and abstracts from Europe (p = 0.001).Conclusions: The majority of abstracts from the prosthodontics research section of IADR General Sessions from 2004 and 2005 remain unpublished. A significant association for publication was noted with neutral outcomes, funding, and abstracts from Europe.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell
dc.relationJournal of Prosthodontics-implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry
dc.relation1.745
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectResearch
dc.subjectmanuscripts
dc.subjectpublication rate
dc.subjectposter
dc.subjectpresentations
dc.subjectIADR
dc.subjectprosthodontics
dc.titleAnalysis of Abstracts Presented at the Prosthodontic Research Section of IADR General Sessions 2004-2005: Demographics, Publication Rates, and Factors Contributing to Publication
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución