dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-30T18:29:51Z
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:43:35Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T14:06:22Z
dc.date.available2013-09-30T18:29:51Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:43:35Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T14:06:22Z
dc.date.created2013-09-30T18:29:51Z
dc.date.created2014-05-20T13:43:35Z
dc.date.issued2010-04-01
dc.identifierImplant Dentistry. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, v. 19, n. 2, p. 167-174, 2010.
dc.identifier1056-6163
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/15215
dc.identifier10.1097/ID.0b013e3181cd715f
dc.identifierWOS:000276564300011
dc.identifier4438747643373395
dc.identifier0493479801083622
dc.identifier0000-0002-4100-5153
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3890475
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The purpose of this study was to compare 2 splinted impression transfer techniques for implant-supported prostheses.Materials: A metal matrix (control) with 4 implants was used. The implants were positioned at 90, 80, 75, and 65 degrees in relation to the surface of the matrix. Squared impression copings were splinted with self-curing acrylic resin in group 1 (n = 10) and with condensation silicone in group 2 (n = 10). A computer software was used to measure the implants/analogs inclinations. Data were analyzed by 2-way analysis of variance and Tukey test (alpha <0.05).Results: There was significant difference between groups, implant/analog inclinations, and interaction between them (P < 0.05). Group 1 had no significant difference from the control (P > 0.05) nor from group 2 (P > 0.05) regardless implant/analog inclinations. Considering implant/analog inclinations, both techniques did not differ from control group (P > 0.05), except for 75 degrees implant/analog inclinations (P < 0.05).Conclusion: The results suggest that condensation silicone may not be used as an alternative splinting material. Furthermore, implant inclination may affect master cast accuracy. (Implant Dent 2010;19:167-174)
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins
dc.relationImplant Dentistry
dc.relation1.307
dc.relation0,712
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectdental implants
dc.subjectprosthodontics
dc.subjectimpression technique
dc.titleEvaluation of Impression Accuracy for Implant at Various Angulations
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución