dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-30T18:29:50Z
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:43:33Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T14:06:19Z
dc.date.available2013-09-30T18:29:50Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:43:33Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T14:06:19Z
dc.date.created2013-09-30T18:29:50Z
dc.date.created2014-05-20T13:43:33Z
dc.date.issued2008-10-01
dc.identifierJournal of Oral Rehabilitation. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, v. 35, n. 10, p. 766-774, 2008.
dc.identifier0305-182X
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/15207
dc.identifier10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01851.x
dc.identifierWOS:000259151400007
dc.identifier4438747643373395
dc.identifier3383392287039820
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3890467
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to compare the stress distribution induced by posterior functional loads on conventional complete dentures and implant-retained overdentures with different attachment systems using a two-dimentional Finite Element Analysis (FEA-2D). Three models representative of edentulous mandible were constructed on AutoCAD software; Group A (control), a model of edentulous mandible supporting a complete denture; Group B, a model of edentulous mandible supporting an overdenture over two splinted implants connected with the bar-clip system; Group C, a model of edentuluos mandible supporting an overdenture over two unsplinted impants with the O-ring system. Evaluation was conducted on Ansys software, with a vertical force of 100 N applied on the mandibular left first molar. When the stress was evaluated in supporting tissues, groups B (51.0 MPa) and C (52.6 MPa) demonstrated higher stress values than group A (10.1 MPa). Within the limits of this study, it may be conclued that the use of an attachment system increased stress values; furthermore, the use of splinted implants associated with the bar-clip attachment system favoured a lower stress distribution over the supporting tissue than the unsplinted implants with an O-ring abutment to retain the manibular overdenture.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing
dc.relationJournal of Oral Rehabilitation
dc.relation2.051
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.subjectdental implants
dc.subjectoverdenture
dc.subjectattachment
dc.subjectfinite element analysis
dc.subjectbiomechanics
dc.titleComparison of stress distribution between complete denture and implant-retained overdenture-2D FEA
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución