dc.contributorUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorTufts Univ
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-30T18:29:45Z
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:43:26Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T14:06:01Z
dc.date.available2013-09-30T18:29:45Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:43:26Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T14:06:01Z
dc.date.created2013-09-30T18:29:45Z
dc.date.created2014-05-20T13:43:26Z
dc.date.issued2010-04-01
dc.identifierJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Philadelphia: W B Saunders Co-elsevier Inc, v. 68, n. 4, p. 724-730, 2010.
dc.identifier0278-2391
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/15152
dc.identifier10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.018
dc.identifierWOS:000276579200003
dc.identifier5535418670745125
dc.identifier0000-0002-9821-2479
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3890432
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this in vitro study was to assess the biomechanical stability of 9 different osteosynthesis methods after sagittal split ramus osteotomy by simulating the masticatory forces and using a 3-point biomechanical test method.Materials and Methods: Forty-five polyurethane hemimandibles with bone-like consistency were randomly assigned to 9 groups (n = 5) and subjected to sagittal split ramus osteotomy. After 4-mm advancement of the distal segment, the bone segments were fixed by different osteosynthesis methods using 2.0-mm miniplate/screw systems: group A, one 4-hole conventional straight miniplate; group B, one 4-hole locking straight miniplate; group C, one 4-hole conventional miniplate and one bicortical screw; group D, one 4-hole locking miniplate and 1 bicortical screw; group E, one 6-hole conventional straight miniplate; group F, one 6-hole locking straight miniplate; group (3: two 4-hole conventional straight miniplates; group H. two 4-hole locking straight miniplates; and group 1, 3 bicortical screws in an inverted-L. pattern. All models were mounted on a base especially constructed for this purpose. Using a 3-point biomechanical test model, the hemimandibles were loaded in compressive strength in an Instron machine (Norwood, MA) until a 3-mm displacement occurred between segments vertically or horizontally. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance and Tukey test (alpha = 1%).Results: The multiparametric comparison of the groups showed a statistically significant difference (P<.01) between groups that used 2 miniplates (groups G and H), 1 miniplate and 1 bicortical screw (groups C and D), and only bicortical screws (group D compared with groups that used only 1 miniplate with 2 screws per segment (groups A and B) and 3 screws per segment (groups E and F).Conclusion: The placement of 2.0-mm-diameter bicortical screws in the retromolar region, associated or not with conventional and locking miniplates with monocortical screws, promoted a better stabilization of bone segments. Locking miniplates presented a better performance in bone fixation in all groups. (C) 2010 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons J Oral Maxillofac Surg 68:724-730, 2010
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherW B Saunders Co-elsevier Inc
dc.relationJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
dc.relation1.779
dc.relation0,967
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.titleIn Vitro Biomechanical Evaluation of the Use of Conventional and Locking Miniplate/Screw Systems for Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución