dc.contributorUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)
dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:39:58Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T13:56:19Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:39:58Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T13:56:19Z
dc.date.created2014-05-20T13:39:58Z
dc.date.issued2010-07-17
dc.identifierVeterinary Record. London: British Veterinary Assoc, v. 167, n. 3, p. 96-99, 2010.
dc.identifier0042-4900
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/13880
dc.identifier10.1136/vr.c3811
dc.identifierWOS:000280423300013
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3889304
dc.description.abstractThe performance of a serum PCR assay was compared with that of a blood PCR assay for the diagnosis of canine brucellosis caused by Brucella canis in 72 dogs. The dogs were classified into three groups (infected, non-infected and suspected brucellosis) according to the results of blood culture and serological tests. The sensitivities of blood PCR and serum PCR were, respectively, 97.14 per cent and 25.71 per cent. The specificities of both were 100 per cent. In the group of dogs with suspected brucellosis, three were positive by blood PCR and none was positive by serum PCR. Serum PCR showed little value for the direct diagnosis of canine brucellosis as the assay had low diagnostic sensitivity and fewer positive dogs were detected by this test than by blood culture, blood PCR, rapid slide agglutination test (RSAT) and RSAT with 2-mercaptoethanol.
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherBritish Veterinary Assoc
dc.relationVeterinary Record
dc.relation2.050
dc.relation0,464
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.titleComparison of a PCR assay in whole blood and serum specimens for canine brucellosis diagnosis
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución