dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributorUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
dc.contributorAlbert Einstein Hosp
dc.date.accessioned2014-05-20T13:32:02Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-05T13:36:58Z
dc.date.available2014-05-20T13:32:02Z
dc.date.available2022-10-05T13:36:58Z
dc.date.created2014-05-20T13:32:02Z
dc.date.issued2009-09-01
dc.identifierAnesthesia and Analgesia. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, v. 109, n. 3, p. 965-971, 2009.
dc.identifier0003-2999
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/10931
dc.identifier10.1213/ane.0b013e3181ad581e
dc.identifierWOS:000269330800043
dc.identifier9276729087180415
dc.identifier8226942130768820
dc.identifier7528116925519142
dc.identifier4043953540121335
dc.identifier0000-0002-1573-4678
dc.identifier0000-0001-8055-5425
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3886986
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: As a result of amitriptyline's vast array of actions, it could potentially be used as an intraspinal adjuvant in neuraxial anesthesia and/or in the treatment of refractory neuropathic pain. None of the previous studies examining the safety profile of intraspinal single doses of amitriptyline found signs of toxicity at concentrations below 15.4 mM/L (0.5%) and the current hypothesis regarding the pathophysiology of amitriptyline toxicity suggests it might be safe at low concentrations while still having relevant clinical effects. Hence, we conducted this study to assess the clinical and histological toxicity of intraspinal amitriptyline at the lowest dosages previously known to be effective.METHODS: Twenty-one dogs were randomized to receive a 1-mL single intraspinal dose of one of the three solutions: saline (0.9%), amitriptyline (0.15%), or amitriptyline (0.3%). The dogs were evaluated clinically 1 h after awakening from anesthesia and 21 days later. At 21 days, all animals were killed, and histological sections of the spinal cord and Surrounding meninges were retrieved for analysis.RESULTS: All dogs recovered motor function, anal sphincter tone and sensibility. With the exception of one dog in the 0.15% amitriptyline group, all animals in both amitriptyline groups had marked adhesive arachnoiditis, which was absent in the control group. No evidence of direct neural damage was found on histological sections stained by glial fibrillary acidic protein technique in any of the study animals.CONCLUSION: The intraspinal administration of amitriptyline to dogs even in low concentrations is strongly associated with the development of intense meningeal adhesive arachnoiditis and is not safe even at low concentrations for which there was no previous evidence of toxicity. (Anesth Analg 2009;109:965-71)
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkins
dc.relationAnesthesia and Analgesia
dc.relation3.463
dc.relation1,472
dc.rightsAcesso restrito
dc.sourceWeb of Science
dc.titleThe Neuraxial Effects of Intraspinal Amitriptyline at Low Concentrations
dc.typeArtigo


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución