dc.contributor | Ramon Moreira Cosenza | |
dc.contributor | http://lattes.cnpq.br/7832300062369054 | |
dc.contributor | Antonio Jaeger | |
dc.contributor | Thaís de Bessa Gontijo de Oliveira | |
dc.creator | Matheus Barbosa Rabello | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-08T11:43:23Z | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-03T23:43:12Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-06-08T11:43:23Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-10-03T23:43:12Z | |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-08T11:43:23Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-06-23 | |
dc.identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/1843/36384 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3827017 | |
dc.description.abstract | We are constantly absorbing contextual information implicitly and our decisions are
influenced by them without us being aware of it. When we make a decision derived from
the way this information is described or presented, passively and lacking an in-depth
reflection, we denominate it as Framing Effect.
This effect impacts substantial fields, such as medicine, consumer behavior and
education. Some people are more susceptible to framing, while others are more
resistant. This work aims to describe its neural bases, still little understood, to determine
how this process works.Thus, it can be clarified how best to apply it in assisting people in
making beneficial choices, in addition to preventing harmful situations.
This review was structured according to the Dual Process Theory that divides the mental
processes in two (Type 1 or T1 and Type 2 or T2). Based on this, the brain areas most
susceptible to framing are mainly related to T1, which is responsible to autonomous,
automatic and instinctive processing. When there is resistance to the framing effect, brain
activation occurs particularly in areas related to T2, which is accountable to more
complex neural mechanisms, therefore, to non-autonomous, deliberate and conscious
processing. The interaction between the T1 and T2 modules evaluates the information
and predicts the susceptibility of the effect in individuals.
Considering the body of studies analyzed, it is reasonable to suggest that the influence of
framing on decisions is greater in an emotional context or in which it presents conformity
with mental predispositions. Equally, the greater the involvement of areas related to
executive functions linked to T2, the greater the resistance to the framing effect. Although
the literature on the subject is robust, there is still little information regarding its
neurobiological bases. Thus, it is necessary to invest in research that addresses the topic
in all its multiplicity. | |
dc.publisher | Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais | |
dc.publisher | Brasil | |
dc.publisher | ICB - INSTITUTO DE CIÊNCIAS BIOLOGICAS | |
dc.publisher | Curso de Especialização em Neurociências e Suas Fronteiras | |
dc.publisher | UFMG | |
dc.rights | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/pt/ | |
dc.rights | Acesso Aberto | |
dc.subject | Neurociências | |
dc.subject | Neurociências e efeito de enquadramento | |
dc.subject | Bases neurais do efeito de enquadramento | |
dc.subject | Framing effect | |
dc.subject | Neurobasis of framing effect | |
dc.subject | Framing effect neuroimaging | |
dc.subject | Framing effect fmri | |
dc.subject | Efeito de enquadramento | |
dc.title | Bases neurais do efeito do enquadramento | |
dc.type | Monografia (especialização) | |