| dc.description.abstract | Many coaches are guided by empirical evidence of training means specificity at the moment of selection stimuli that are executed by the athletes during the training routine. The utility of an instrument scientific elaborated may allow coaches identify the specificity of a stimulus and also contribute to the load registration. The objective of this study was elaborate, coding and content validating a catalog of judo training means. Initially, five experts coaches in judo described during and semi-structured interview what exercises are used during the judo training. The exercises were transcribed into a sheet and grouped according to its similarity e combined with training methods, generating seventy six groups of training means. The sheet was sent to nine Judges (experts in judo with theoretical knowledge in overall sports training. The Judges evaluated by a Likert Scale with 1-5 points, three indicators of content validity: clarity of language, the practical pertinence and the theoretical relevance of each groups of training means. Besides that, the Judges had chosen the dimension of each group of training means. The coefficient of content validity was used as tool to statistically measure the values found for the three indicators. The coefficient of Kappa of Cohen was used to verify the agreement concordance intensity between Judges throughout the dimension chosen. The statistical results found for each indicator and for the dimension are in agreement with the scientific literature, what ensure the content validity of this catalogue. According to its results the content validity of this catalogue was established, moreover, this instrument are ready to be used by judo coaches as theoretical guide during planning and training registration. | |
