dc.creatorEmílio Peluso Neder Meyer
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-04T18:23:47Z
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-03T23:11:17Z
dc.date.available2021-08-04T18:23:47Z
dc.date.available2022-10-03T23:11:17Z
dc.date.created2021-08-04T18:23:47Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier2236-1766
dc.identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/1843/37267
dc.identifierhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7500-0705
dc.identifier.urihttp://repositorioslatinoamericanos.uchile.cl/handle/2250/3818258
dc.description.abstractThe article, opposing itself to the traditional scientific production about the theme, aims at presenting a critical reading of United States constitutionalism. Without completely withdraw its importance for Comparative Constitutional Law, it targets, however, to confirm the hypothesis that this constitutionalism has, besides its democratic record, also an authoritarian one, essentially centered in keeping a property, racist and slavish regime. Far from “American exceptionalism”, what is plausible to verify is a model in which institutional advancements are the whole time in tension with fundamental rights and democracy restrictions. The methodology applied recurs to critical approach to traditional theoretical references, adding an institutional analyses and judicial precedents checking that formed the constitutional practice of that country.
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais
dc.publisherBrasil
dc.publisherDIR - DEPARTAMENTO DE DIREITO PÚBLICO
dc.publisherUFMG
dc.relationRevista Direito Público
dc.rightsAcesso Aberto
dc.subjectConstitucionalismo
dc.subjectEstados Unidos
dc.subjectControle jurisdicional de constitucionalidade
dc.subjectDesigualdade
dc.titleUm processo de desmistificação: compreendendo criticamente o constitucionalismo estadunidense
dc.typeArtigo de Periódico


Este ítem pertenece a la siguiente institución